The Abolition of Man' nails why some classrooms feel sterile. Lewis says cutting emotion from learning creates 'empty shells.' My friend, a science teacher, laments how labs focus only on metrics, never the marvel of life. Lewis believed in objective beauty—that a waterfall isn’t just H2O but sublime. Modern education often misses that. Maybe that’s why kids binge fantasy novels; they crave the wonder schools exclude.
Lewis’s book is a fire alarm for modern education. He critiques how we train kids to doubt traditions without offering anything solid in return. I volunteer at a youth center, and the teens there can deconstruct ads but struggle to describe goodness. Lewis’s 'green book' analogy—where teachers mock sentimental poetry—mirrors how we often ridicule earnestness. Education should build souls, not just skeptics. Maybe that’s why classics like 'Narnia' still resonate; they don’t just teach—they baptize the imagination.
Reading 'The Abolition of Man' made me rethink my own schooling. Lewis warns against teaching kids to 'see through' everything—to debunk values instead of cherishing them. My high school English class reduced 'Macbeth' to a power struggle, ignoring its moral terror. Lewis calls this 'men without chests,' people who can’t feel awe or shame. It’s scary how education can hollow out wonder, turning art into algebra. Now I hunt for books that stir the soul, not just the brain.
Lewis’s critique in 'The Abolition of Man' feels like a gut punch to how we teach kids today. He says education’s turned into a factory, pumping out 'clever devils' instead of wise humans. I see it everywhere—schools prioritize STEM over stories, logic over love for learning. My nephew’s homework is all data and no dante, and it breaks my heart. Lewis feared we’d lose the 'chest,' the bridge between primal instincts and rational thought, and honestly? TikTok debates prove him right.
The Abolition of Man' by C.S. Lewis hits hard when it comes to modern education. He argues that the system often strips away the emotional and moral fabric of learning, reducing everything to cold, objective facts. I see this in schools today—kids are taught to analyze texts without ever feeling their power, like dissecting a frog without appreciating its life. Lewis calls this 'the abolition of man' because it risks creating people without hearts, just calculators in human skin.
What really stuck with me was his idea of the 'Tao,' the universal moral law that education should nurture. Instead, modern curricula often treat values as subjective, which leaves students adrift. I’ve talked to teachers who feel trapped—they want to inspire, but standardized testing sucks the soul out of classrooms. Lewis warned about this decades ago, and it’s eerie how spot-on he was. Sometimes I wonder if we’re raising a generation that can solve equations but can’t tell right from wrong.
2025-12-10 00:57:49
8
View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
The Professor's Mate Clause
Kimberly Ingrid
10
11.4K
I thought my life was ruined when Kelvin betrayed me again. I thought heartbreak was the worst I’d ever feel.
I didn’t expect it would lead me straight into the arms of danger or desire.
When Professor Adrian Metcalfe offered me a deal I couldn’t refuse a fake relationship to make Kelvin jealous. I thought it was just a game. But Adrian wasn’t just a professor. He wasn’t just dangerous. He was my mate. My fated mate.
And I was human… or so I thought.
The night of Kelvin’s wedding changes everything. I watch my teacher shift into a werewolf. Secrets unravel. My own hidden power awakens. And suddenly, the past isn’t just painful, it's deadly.
Kelvin wasn’t who I thought he was. Adrian’s control isn’t just discipline; it’s destiny. And as the web of betrayal tightens around me, I realize love is the only weapon that can save me and claim what is rightfully mine.
Welcome to a world where forbidden love, hidden power, and revenge collide… and where your mate is the only one who can keep you alive.
Student x Teacher | Touch her and die | Steamy | Forbidden | Brother's best friend | Age Gap | Enemies to lovers | Badass FMC
He hates her.
She hates him.
For a year already, Mr. Adkins has been cruel to Norali. Her teacher keeps failing her, keeps making comments to her and keeps her late in class. She can't seem to understand why he has such an aversion to her, but she has been equally as mean back.
He is mean, strict and has every woman swooning for him. Except for Norali. The loathing in his eyes, the way his hands turn into fists and his jaw clenches every time he sets eyes on her is enough for her to see right through his good looks. Most of the time.
But he is the only one teaching the subject. There's no escaping him.
And that's exactly how Jace likes it. Norali is his. His to hate, his to desire... His to own. He is in every way a control freak but only wants to have complete control of one person... His student who doesn't listen.
He hates her.
A sexy teacherXstudent book which will have you on the edge of your seat! Fun, forbidden, light-hearted and full of sexual tension.
PAIN AND PLEASURE: The BDSM SERIES
Book 1: Classroom Punishment
Will
No one knows that the professor who commands the entire class is the same woman I control completely. The same classroom where she teaches, becomes the place where I punish her after everyone’s gone.
Iva
I’ve always known about my dark desires, to be controlled, to be punished, but I never imagined one of my own students would be the one to fulfill them. As he tests my limits and takes control, we both find ourselves falling deeper… every single day.
***
“Professor, you know I don’t repeat myself. Open your legs now, or I’ll put you over my lap and spank you. Is that what you want, your students discovering that their strict professor is a submissive?”
Fuck! Why do his warnings always turn me on instead of pissing me off?
This time, I splay my legs, trying not to provoke him further. I quickly glance around. Thankfully, everyone is too busy working on their test to notice anything. My breath catches as his hand slips between my thighs, under the desk.
***
She was never supposed to want him.
He was never supposed to touch her.
Behind closed doors, the woman who controls the classroom becomes the one who surrenders.
The student who obeys the rules becomes the one who makes them.
But love is far more dangerous than desire.
If they are discovered, she will lose her career.
If they walk away, they will lose each other.
“What did I promise would happen if you threw another punch, Artemis?” Professor Lucian's silky tone hardened into a dark fascinating baritone.
“Let me see…” Artemis licked his lips with a menacing smile, his cold dark eyes piercing through the professor's oceanic ones. “You said you'll bring me to my knees but something tells me I'll do more than just begging.”
The air in the room shifted as the older man took a step closer.
“Hit me, Artemis,” Lucian took another step closer. “Every second you hesitate, your punishment doubles.”
Artemis lips curled in a smirk as he stepped closer. He raised his hand slowly to the professor's lips but the older man caught it before it could make contact.
An amused chuckle rumbled in his chest.
“Twenty seconds gone, Professor. You better punish me hard,” he smirked.
*******
Artemis McAlester was feared for two reasons. His ability to break anything and his power to own everything. Kingston College was his playground until a red-haired professor with oceanic blue eyes and a dangerous intolerance for spoiled bullies.
Not only did Lucian defy every rule he set, but he was also the one thing Artemis couldn’t own. And that defiance? It was the sexiest thing of all.
Except Lucian wasn't someone he could break. To own the blue-eyed professor, Artemis would have to do the unthinkable. Submit. Break. Let himself be owned.
As long as the only thing between them was desire and pure unadulterated hate.
Zoey Prince was a good girl. A girl with impressive goals.
Goal Number One: Finish her bachelor's before age 21 - Tick
Goal Number Two: Begin her Master’s by age 22 - Tick
Goal Number Three: Get married to the love of her life by 25 - Not Quite
On the day her Master’s program began, she discovered that the man she’d spent the past four years loving was cheating on her with her best friend, his excuse being that she was boring and by the books, and he needed someone fun. Zoey was shattered.
Throwing caution to the wind, Zoe decided to prove to herself that she was not a boring person. She went on an escapade and this led her into the arms of the one man that promised to make her life a living hell. Professor Simon Beaumont.
Simon Beaumont was a menace. At thirty-three, he’d achieved a feat his peers hadn’t achieved half of.
Feat: Become a professor by twenty-eight - Tick
Feat: Become a billionaire before thirty-five - Tick
Feat: Get over his divorce from his ex-wife - Not Quite
When his student, Zoey Prince got on his nerves, he was determined to make her life a living hell. When life threw her into his arms, he pushed, but soon he came to realize something: They both needed each other.
Zoey would help him get over his messy divorce, and he would teach things about her body.
…
“Zoey, a man as impure as me shouldn’t be with someone as chaste as you. I’m a sinner before man, and before God.” Simon muttered as Zoey dry-humped him, placing her hands on his neck, her fingernails digging into the flesh of his nape.
“I don’t care, professor. Just claim me as yours.” She whimpered
into his ear.
He was my professor, the Alpha of the Silver Crest Pack. Feared by every wolf on campus. In class, he was a sucker for rules, but outside, he was the kind of savage who obeyed no one. Especially not the Moon Goddess.
I ran to this University to escape and arranged marriage, find freedom and my true mate. I wasn't expecting him, and I definitely wasn't expecting to snap at the one man who could order my head served on a platter to him.
Then I realized he was mine. Mine to own, my mate!
But he was the same man who helped destroy my family and Pack. The same Alpha who had murdered my brother without a second thought.
The rules said we couldn't touch. I wouldn't reject me, I couldn't resist gin and every time another man looked at me, his wolf edged closer to savage.
Sleeping with him would ruin everything. So why did I want it so badly?
He was my curse, my punishment, and my aching obsession.
Reading 'The Abolition of Man' feels like peeling an onion—layer after layer of profound ideas about morality and education. C.S. Lewis argues that modern society’s rejection of objective values ('the Tao') leads to humanity’s ultimate degradation. He warns that if we reduce morality to mere subjective preferences or scientific manipulation, we risk losing what makes us human. The book’s central metaphor is chilling: those who seek to conquer nature end up conquering themselves, stripping away their own humanity in the process.
What really stuck with me was Lewis’s critique of how education systems can subtly erode moral intuition. He dissects textbooks that teach kids to dismiss emotions like awe or reverence as 'just feelings.' It’s not just an academic debate—it’s about whether future generations will even recognize goodness when they see it. The last chapter haunts me with its vision of 'Conditioners,' elites who reshape humanity but have no moral compass themselves.
I picked up 'The Abolition of Man' expecting a dense philosophical novel, but boy was I surprised! It’s actually a series of lectures by C.S. Lewis, packaged into a short but impactful nonfiction work. Lewis digs into education, morality, and how society’s shifting values affect humanity’s core. His arguments are razor-sharp, especially when he critiques subjectivism—the idea that all values are just personal feelings. It’s wild how something written in 1943 still feels urgent today, like he predicted modern debates about truth and relativism.
What stuck with me most was his warning about 'men without chests'—people so detached from their emotions that they can’t even recognize objective good or beauty. It’s not light reading, but every page crackles with insights. I’d recommend it to anyone who enjoys 'Mere Christianity' or wants to understand Lewis beyond Narnia.
Reading 'The Abolition of Man' feels like stepping into a timeless debate about what it means to be human. Lewis doesn’t just argue against moral relativism; he paints a vivid picture of how stripping away objective values dehumanizes us. His 'Tao' concept—this universal moral framework—resonates because it’s not just philosophy; it’s about preserving wonder, love, and even the stories we tell. I still think about his warning against reducing education to mere conditioning—it’s eerie how relevant that feels today, with algorithms shaping so much of how we think.
What makes it a classic, though, is how Lewis balances depth with clarity. He’s not drowning in jargon; he’s writing for anyone who’s felt unease about a world where 'value' is just a subjective whim. The way he ties ethics to everyday experiences—like how we react to a sunset or a poem—makes it stick. It’s one of those books where you underline half the sentences because they put words to feelings you’ve had but never articulated.
Carter G. Woodson's 'The Mis-Education of the Negro' hits hard with its critique of an education system designed to perpetuate dependency rather than empowerment. He argues that Black students are taught to admire Eurocentric history, literature, and values while their own heritage is sidelined or distorted. This creates a psychological disconnect—students internalize the idea that their culture is inferior, which stifles self-determination. Woodson isn’t just criticizing curriculum gaps; he’s exposing how schooling conditions Black minds to accept subjugation, making liberation harder. It’s a systemic issue where teachers (often unprepared to challenge biases) reinforce the status quo instead of fostering critical thinking.
What’s wild is how relevant this still feels today. Sure, some schools now include Black history months or token figures, but the core problem remains: education often treats Blackness as an add-on, not a foundation. Woodson’s call for community-based education—where learning ties directly to uplift and practical needs—resonates deeply. Imagine if schools taught financial literacy, African diasporic history, and resistance strategies instead of just prep for low-wage jobs. His book isn’t just a critique; it’s a blueprint for what radical, unapologetic education could look like.