Okay, so I’m the kind of person who’ll tell you the quick casting nuts-and-bolts and then add a tiny bit of fan-geek color. For the 1927 title, look for Ivor Novello as the central lodger in Alfred Hitchcock’s silent 'The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog', with June Tripp and Marie Ault in important supporting roles — it’s classic silent-era suspense with moody fog and expressionist framing. The 2009 film called 'The Lodger' stars Alfred Molina in the main role; his presence shifts the story into a more modern, actor-focused thriller. If you want suggestions: watch the 1927 one for film-history vibes and the 2009 one to see how a veteran actor like Molina reshapes the archetype.
I've long had a soft spot for old mysteries, so digging into the two versions of 'The Lodger' feels like paging through a dusty, thrilling scrapbook. The original silent classic is 'The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog' (1927) — that one is most famous for being an early Alfred Hitchcock film and for launching Ivor Novello as the mysterious, brooding lodger. Novello plays the central, ambiguous figure (Jonathan Drew in some sources), and the movie also features June Tripp as the young woman who becomes entangled in the plot. Marie Ault turns up in a strong supporting role, and the tension between suspicion and atmosphere is what makes the film stick in people’s memories even a century later. Hitchcock’s direction, the moody foggy London visuals, and Novello’s performance combine to make it a real silent-era gem that I still rewatch when I want that eerie, restrained kind of suspense.
Jumping to the 2009 reimagining, the modern film called 'The Lodger' takes the old Jack the Ripper-inspired premise and gives it a contemporary spin — and it’s anchored by Alfred Molina in the lead. Molina brings his usual magnetism and texture to the role, and the cast around him leans into the thriller beats in a very different way from the silent original. While the 1927 picture relies on expressionistic images and implication, the 2009 version is more explicit and performance-driven, which gives Molina room to play subtler human moments alongside the suspense. If you like comparing filmmaking styles across eras, seeing Ivor Novello’s silent presence against Molina’s modern character work is like watching two different languages describe the same haunted house. I end up recommending both versions: watch the 1927 film for atmosphere and film history, and the 2009 one if you want a contemporary character-led take that shows how the same core story can be reshaped for a new audience.
2025-08-30 22:58:57
18
View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
The Gorgeous Landlady
Coco Shaw
0
4.1K
Have you guys ever encountered a gorgeous landlady when renting an apartment?
I live just opposite mine. Initially, I think she's an aloof beauty. That impression changes when I catch her swaying her hips as she sweeps the staircase one day.
Later, after we get to know each other better, she enthusiastically invites me to her place for some fun.
One day, I hide in her closet and watch her and her husband get it on…
Max Walker, a charming but untidy chef, is the last person Grace Chen, an uptight editorial assistant, anticipates when she finds herself in dire need of a roommate. He is spontaneous, gregarious, and utterly unorganized everything she is not. Despite their apparent inability to live together, their desperate financial situation compels them to attempt. What begins as a personality conflict gradually changes into something neither party anticipated. Grace and Max learn that sometimes the one who makes you feel at home is the one who drives you crazy as their walls fall down. But when their new connection is threatened by past relationships and job chances, they have to choose between their planned life and their newfound love.
For ten years, my professor husband, Daniel Whitmore, and I loved each other deeply, treating each other with respect and care.
Our only regret was that he had azoospermia, so we were never able to have a child.
Then, on our tenth wedding anniversary, the housekeeper, Megan Wright, suddenly claimed she was pregnant with Daniel's child.
I thought she was joking.
Two days later, she threw a paternity test result in my face. The test proved that the child she was carrying was Daniel's.
Megan sued us.
On the day of the hearing, she cried in front of the courthouse, telling the media how Daniel had molested her. She said we were a pair of perverts who treated her like a breeding machine and kept her confined in our home.
Daniel and I couldn't defend ourselves at all. The netizens labeled us demon employers and nailed us to a pillar of shame.
Daniel lost his job at the university, and his students were ashamed of him.
I was fired from my company that same day.
In the end, Daniel couldn't withstand the pressure of public opinion and committed suicide in prison.
I became a rat on the streets, hunted down and beaten by netizens. Driven insane, I wandered into traffic and died miserably in the middle of the road.
Even at death, I couldn't understand how Megan had become pregnant with the child of my husband, who had azoospermia.
When I opened my eyes again, I had been reborn to the day before Megan claimed she was pregnant with Daniel's child.
Julianna Macey, or Juls for short, is desperate to leave her parents' home. Living at home for her undergrad degree is ruining her social life and making it difficult for her to keep in touch with friends. So when her friend Carlo offers her the chance to move into a student apartment, she jumps at the chance.
The only problem is that the available room is shared by his three friends Kyle, Mark, and Kent. As if living with three boys she's never met wasn't bad enough, Kent appears to despise her. When she's around, he makes a mess in the kitchen, never puts his laundry in the dryer, and acts as if she doesn't exist.
Despite being good looking, Kent and Juls develop a fierce hatred for one another, and she begins to regret her decision to move in with them. However, because her lease still has a year to run, she is unable to leave. Juls begins to question whether living with boys has any benefits or if she acted prematurely. More importantly, she questions whether or not she and Kent will ever get along as well as why he despises her so much.
Karina Garcia spent her entire life being treated like a mistake.
Abused by the family that took her in and forced to live in her sister’s shadow, she never imagined her life would become even worse—until she was sold off to marry Devon Russell, the cold and dangerous billionaire rumored to destroy every woman who gets close to him.
But the marriage was never meant for her.
It was meant for her sister.
After a night that changes everything, Devon discovers the truth and believes Karina deceived him to steal another woman’s place in his life. Branded a manipulative liar and trapped in a loveless marriage she never wanted, Karina becomes the target of his hatred while the real villains hide behind innocent smiles.
Now, bound to a man who swears he’ll never forgive her, Karina is forced to survive inside the ruthless Russell mansion—where every secret has a price, every lie is deadly, and the line between hatred and obsession grows thinner by the day.
Devon Russell may hate his wife…
But he refuses to let her go.
"Don't you love me anymore?"
"I don't have time for this."
.-.-.-.-.-.
There are some words a woman will never be prepared for, and Kaitlyn discovers just how true that is. Engaged to her childhood sweetheart, Kaitlyn had it all. A cushy job, a beautiful home, and the love of her life. So life should have been sweet... shouldn't it? Kaitlyn is going to discover that you can only lie to yourself for so long. When Randy chooses to house a roommate, Jackson may be just what she needs to unlock the secrets in her 'happy' home.
Bold, flirtatious, and handsome. He's nothing like her future husband. But which one does she need? Dive into a tale of love, betrayal, secrets, and growth. After all, when life changes, so do you.
What a delight to talk about a silent thriller that still gives me goosebumps—Alfred Hitchcock directed the 1927 film 'The Lodger' (often credited in full as 'The Lodger: A Story of the London Fog'). I first learned that fact during a late-night film club screening when someone shouted out the director’s name as the credits rolled; it felt like discovering a secret handshake among cinephiles. Hitchcock’s hand is unmistakable even in this early work: the careful framing, the fascination with identity and suspicion, and the way tension grows from ordinary domestic spaces. If you want the straight identifier, Alfred Hitchcock is the director — but the richer payoff is seeing how his style germinates here.
Watching 'The Lodger' on an old projector in a cramped classroom cinema was one of those experiences that sticks with you. The film is silent and relies on visual storytelling in a way modern movies rarely do, and that pushes Hitchcock’s emerging talents into full view. The lead performance by Ivor Novello as the enigmatic lodger is brilliantly inscrutable; you’re constantly guessing whether he’s a victim of circumstance or something darker. The movie’s use of shadows, oblique camera angles, and montage sequences already hinted at the suspense language Hitchcock would later master. I still find myself pausing on certain frames to study how tension is built purely through composition and rhythm—No soundtrack drama, just deliberate pacing and uncanny visuals.
Beyond the immediate chills, 'The Lodger' is also interesting for how it plants recurring motifs that show up across Hitchcock’s career: the fascination with the ‘wrong man’, the interplay of public panic and private doubt, and the archetype of the blonde heroine under threat. It’s adapted from Marie Belloc Lowndes’ novel 'The Lodger', and you can sense Hitchcock reshaping the material to emphasize atmosphere over explicit explanation. Every time I revisit it, I pick up another tiny directorial choice that later becomes a trademark—like a camera movement that privileges a character’s perspective, or a sequence that makes the city itself feel like a character.
If you’ve never seen it, I’d recommend hunting down a good restoration and watching it with the sound turned low while paying attention to framing and cutting. For anyone who loves tracing where modern genre beats came from, 'The Lodger' is a compact masterclass. It’s the seed of Hitchcock’s obsession with suspense and identity, and knowing he directed it changes how you read the film’s sly manipulations. Personally, it makes me want to host another midnight screening and argue with friends about whether the lodger is more tragic or ominous—what do you think?
I’ve spent a few nights digging through streaming shops for weird little thrillers, and finding 'The Lodger' (2009) has been one of those scavenger-hunt pleasures. First thing I’ll say: don’t type just the title into a search bar and assume the results are the 2009 remake — there are older films called 'The Lodger' (1927, 1944) and a few unrelated shorts, so adding the year saves a lot of disappointment. In my experience, the fastest way to locate it is to check the big digital storefronts: Amazon Prime Video (as a rental or purchase), Apple TV / iTunes, Google Play / Google TV, YouTube Movies, and Vudu. Those are the usual suspects for older niche releases and often carry a rental option for a couple of bucks or a HD purchase for a bit more. I often start with Amazon because of how conveniently it lists rental and purchase options in my region.
If you want a reliable, region-aware lookup before hopping between stores, use a site like JustWatch or Reelgood. I keep one of those tabs open while scouting — they let you flip the country, and they’ll show whether 'The Lodger' (2009) is streaming free with ads, included with a subscription, or available to rent/purchase. That saved me a lot of time when a title was exclusive to one platform in my country. Also, check free ad-supported services (Tubi, Pluto, Plex) occasionally; niche thrillers sometimes pop up there for short windows. If the movie isn’t on subscription services, it’s almost certainly rentable on one of the digital stores mentioned earlier.
If you prefer a physical copy, I’ve found DVDs or Blu-rays of smaller films listed on sites like eBay, Amazon Marketplace, or secondhand shops. Libraries sometimes have these titles too — I managed to borrow obscure thrillers through my local library’s DVD collection once, and it felt like flipping through a hidden bookshelf. One last tip: if you’re outside the country where a platform offers it, you could consider a VPN but be mindful of terms of service and local laws. Honestly, for something like 'The Lodger' (2009) I usually rent it in HD from whichever store ends up cheapest and watch with a cozy snack setup — works every time.