Which Artists Are Featured On Xxxtentacion Changes Remix?

That slow, aching piano on 'changes' always grabs me, and the version I keep coming back to still carries John Cunningham's fingerprints. From what I’ve dug into and listened for, the official production credit on 'changes' — and the officially released remix iterations tied to the record label — point to John Cunningham, who was X's frequent collaborator and co-producer on a lot of his softer, more intimate tracks. Cunningham’s style is subtle: sparse keys, warm reverb, and room for the vocal to breathe, which is exactly what makes both the original and sanctioned remixes feel so close and personal. I also want to flag something fans often miss: there are a ton of unofficial remixes and fan-made edits floating around SoundCloud, YouTube, and Instagram where other producers toss beats under X’s vocals. Those are produced by independent beatmakers and DJs and aren’t the same as the label-backed remix that retains Cunningham’s core production. For me, Cunningham’s touch is what keeps the song haunting rather than overproduced — it’s why I still press play when the mood calls for something raw and reflective.

I've chased down release dates and catalog listings for this one, and here's the clearest take I could piece together. 'Changes' originally appears on XXXTentacion's album '?', which was released March 16, 2018, so the base track's wide release is pinned there. There never was a widely distributed, label-backed 'official' remix of 'Changes' that showed up on major streaming services as a separate, sanctioned release. What did happen instead is that after his passing, a bunch of unofficial remixes, edits, and collabs popped up across SoundCloud, YouTube, and fan channels throughout mid-to-late 2018 and beyond—people sliced the vocal, layered new production, or paired X's vocals with other artists in fan edits. If you’re hunting for a specific remix upload, the upload dates will vary by creator and platform; you'll often find those fan remixes clustered in the months after June 2018. For the canonical record: the album release (and therefore the original track's mainstream release) is March 16, 2018, and there isn’t an official remix release from his label that’s recognized across the streaming catalogs. Personally, I find those fan-made versions interesting for hearing creative spins, even if they’re not 'official'—some of them genuinely reframe the song in cool ways, so I still bop to a few of them now and then.

I still get chills talking about how a remix can totally flip the mood of a song, and the way the 'changes' remix does that is such a love-it-or-lean-into-it moment for me. The original 'changes' is spare and intimate: mostly piano, quiet drums or just the pulse, and X's voice up front, fragile and close. The remix, depending on which version you hear, layers in more production — heavier low end, subtle synth pads, and sometimes a new percussion pattern that gives the track a slightly steadier tempo. That shift in instrumentation moves the song from a whisper to something that breathes a little bigger without killing the tenderness. Beyond production, the remix often introduces added vocal textures. Sometimes there are background harmonies, doubled vocals, or a featured verse from another artist who contrasts with X's melancholic delivery. That change in vocal arrangement can alter the emotional arc: where the original feels like a private confessional, the remix can feel like a conversation or even a communal lament. Mixing and mastering choices matter too — the remix usually brings a brighter sheen, clearer bass, and more present midrange so the hook hits differently on headphones and in car speakers. What I love about both versions is that they highlight different strengths. The original showcases raw intimacy and lyrical vulnerability, while the remix experiments with dynamics and collaboration, making the same melody feel broader and, in some cases, more radio-friendly. Personally, I flip between them depending on my mood — late-night reflection for the original, and a daytime, slightly more energetic mood for the remix.

I'm leaning toward a cautious yes — but only if the remix appeared on official channels with the estate and label credits. When I look at how posthumous releases for 'Changes' have been handled, everything that landed on Spotify, Apple Music, or YouTube under XXXTentacion's artist page and carried a Bad Vibes Forever or Empire Distribution credit went through the estate and label. Those are the releases that count as authorized: they come with publishing clearances, label metadata, and usually a press notice or official playlisting. If a remix popped up on a random SoundCloud account or a YouTube channel without those credits, that one probably wasn't authorized. To make that call in practice I check three things: (1) is it hosted on the main streaming services under X's profile, (2) what label/publisher is listed in the track info, and (3) did the estate or label post about it? For 'Changes' specifically, the official remixes or reworks that made their way to major platforms carried those markers. Unauthorized remixes often circulate among DJs or fan uploads, and they can look legit at a glance but legally they’re different animals. Personally, I get protective about posthumous edits — I want the artist's vision respected. If the label and estate signed off, I’m more comfortable saying it was authorized; if it’s floating around on niche uploaders with no credits, I treat it as unofficial and keep my skepticism. It’s complicated, but those checks usually tell the story for me.

I get excited just thinking about tracking down legit remixes, so here's how I handle the hunt for the 'Changes' remix and where you can stream it legally. The easiest route is the major subscription services: Spotify, Apple Music, Tidal, Amazon Music, and YouTube Music commonly carry official remixes if the estate or label has released them. Search for 'Changes (Remix)' or check XXXTentacion’s verified artist profile — official releases usually live on the artist page and are tagged clearly as remixes. I usually save a copy to my library and look at the release credits to confirm it’s an authorized version rather than a fan edit. If you prefer video-first listening, check the official YouTube channel or Vevo upload; those are frequently the most reliable legal sources and often include lyrics in the description or links to buy. SoundCloud occasionally hosts sanctioned remixes or promo versions, but availability varies by region and by whether the rights holders approved the upload. For permanent ownership, buying the track on iTunes/Apple Music or Amazon MP3 is the safest legal option — you get the file and the peace of mind that the artist and rights holders are being supported. Personally, I like using Tidal or Apple Music when I want high-fidelity listens, and I’ll cross-reference with the official YouTube upload for a quick watchable version. That remix still hits me in the chest on late-night playlists.

Fans often mix up the spelling and the work itself, so the first thing I do is separate the two likely things people mean: the Finnish glam-rock band Wreckless Love and the worship song 'Reckless Love' that Cory Asbury helped write. That split matters because collaborators and remixers live in totally different worlds for each title. For the band Wreckless Love, most of what you’ll find labeled as remixes are producer- or DJ-driven reworks rather than guest-vocal collaborations; the band’s official releases tend to credit remix artists or producers on the single/EP notes. For the worship song 'Reckless Love' (written by Cory Asbury, Caleb Culver, and Ran Jackson), there have been countless covers, live reinterpretations, and unofficial remixes created by worship collectives, church bands, and independent producers. So if someone asks “which artists collaborated on wreckless love remixes?” it really depends which project they mean — the band’s remixes credit remix producers, while the worship song spawned covers and remix-style versions by various church artists and producers. Personally, I like digging into streaming credits or Discogs to see the exact remix/producer names; it tells you whether you’re looking at a DJ remix, a live worship reinterpretation, or a cross-genre collab. It’s messy but kind of fun to trace. I always end up discovering a remixer who gives the song a whole new life.

Sampling is such a fascinating aspect of music, and 'You're Gone and I Gotta Stay High Remix' is one of those tracks that has really resonated with a lot of artists. I’ve come across many who have decided to take elements from it and weave their own magic. For instance, the remixer, Hozier, has a beautiful spin on the song that amplifies the emotional depth while maintaining that catchy vibe. Then there's also Lil Uzi Vert, who has integrated a bit of the essence into his hits, showcasing how versatile this remix can be across genres. You can even hear echoes of its influence in places like TikTok, where various creators have incorporated segments into their own content, further pushing its reach. There's something about that blend of deep emotion and catchy beats that invites so many reimaginings. It's almost like a warm blanket that artists want to cozy up to and make their own. The community surrounding these samples really brings us together as fans—and isn't that what music is all about?

Oh man, this is such a fun little music-sleuthing question — I love it. From the way you phrased it I'm guessing you're asking which artists have sampled the vocal or instrumental line that goes like 'make me you' in their remixes, but there’s a tiny problem: that exact phrase could belong to a handful of different songs and titles (for example, there are tracks called 'Make Me', 'Make Me (Cry)', and dozens with 'You Make Me' in the title). Because of that ambiguity, the quickest way to get a reliable list is to treat it like detective work — and I’ll walk you through how I’d do that, plus the kinds of artists who most often appear on sample-remix threads. First, if you’ve got the clip (even 10–15 seconds), upload it somewhere public (YouTube, a private SoundCloud link, or Discord) and then run it through Shazam or SoundHound. Those apps sometimes ID the original source straight away. If that doesn’t work, head to WhoSampled and type in possible original track names — it’s the classic resource for seeing who sampled whom, including official remixes and mixtape flips. If you don’t have the exact title, search lyric fragments in Genius or Google with quotes around 'make me you' plus the word 'lyrics' — sometimes the searchable lyric text will point you to the original track and the artist behind it. Assuming you identify the original song, next I’d look at remix credits on Discogs, Bandcamp, and the single’s release page. Remixes usually have clear credits: producers love getting their names on these. If you’re dealing with unofficial remixes, YouTube and SoundCloud are goldmines; search for '[original song title] remix' plus filters for upload date and listener comments. Fans in the comment section often shout out the exact sample or the remixer who reused it. Reddit communities like r/NameThatSong or r/TipOfMyTongue (music threads) can also help if you post the snippet — people there are wickedly good at sample ID. If you want a short list of the kinds of artists who frequently sample vocal snippets in remixes — and thus are prime suspects — look at electronic and hip-hop producers who are known for vocal chopping: Flume, Kaytranada, Mura Masa, RL Grime, Disclosure, ODESZA, and Clams Casino. They don’t necessarily sample your exact line, but they commonly flip R&B and pop vocals into their signature textures, so if the remix sounds like one of those styles, check their catalogs or remix credits. Finally, if you can share even a tiny clip (and you’re comfortable with posting it), I’ll flag the most likely remixers and platforms to search first — this kind of hunt is one of my favorite rabbit holes to go down. Back when I used to traipse through record shops and swap remixes on burned CDs, sample-hunting felt like archaeology: it’s methodical, sometimes frustrating, and wildly satisfying when you find the match. If you don’t already know the original track titled something like 'Make Me' or 'You Make Me', I’d take a two-track approach: identify the source, then map the remix genealogy. For the first part, beyond Shazam and Genius, I often use MusicBrainz and Tracklib (Tracklib is especially useful if someone has legitimately cleared a sample — Tracklib’ll sometimes list where a sample was licensed). For the genealogy, Discogs and the liner notes of physical releases still catch a lot of official remixes that streaming metadata misses. There’s also a trick I learned from a friend who DJs old R&B and pop sets: search for acapella versions of likely originals. Acapellas are, surprisingly often, uploaded to YouTube or traded in DJ pools. Once you have an acapella, throw it into your DAW and match tempos and keys with the remix; it’s often obvious when vocals are reused. If you’re missing production credit info, I’ll usually triangulate using release dates — remixes that sample a vocal tend to appear in the months following the vocal’s popularity spike — and cross-reference with the remixers’ own social feeds (they love posting stems, previews, and shout-outs). If you’d like, give me the artist you think the original might be or paste a link to a clip, and I’ll dig through the credits and remix pages — I get oddly excited about tracing these chains, and I’ve found gems in the most unlikely corners before. As a DIY producer who spends part of my evenings chopping vocals for my own remixes, I’ve gotten pretty practical about identifying sampled lines. If you’re trying to figure out which artists have sampled a vocal like 'make me you', here’s the hands-on workflow I’d use: first, isolate the phrase using an EQ or by finding an acapella if possible. Then run it through spectral analysis (even a free Audacity spectrogram) to get a sense of unique harmonic fingerprints; that can help when you’re comparing it to a remix that’s heavily processed. Next, search the web with descriptive terms: 'vocal sample “make me you” remix chopped' — odd queries like that sometimes surface DJ setlists or blog posts where people talk about specific flips. When I’m uncertain, I also check the remixers who are historically generous with sampling: Diplo and his various projects, Major Lazer collabs, and the smaller underground trap and bass producers who rework pop hooks for remixes. They often leave telltale production signatures: a certain snare reverb or a pitch-shifted vocal timbre. If you want me to, I can start by pulling up likely originals with that lyric and scanning known remix catalogs by the producers I mentioned. If you’d rather not post audio publicly, try sending a private link or just the track name you suspect — even a small clue narrows the search dramatically. Either way, I’m already picturing the moment we find the source and trace every remix that used it — it’s like unlocking a little musical family tree, and I love that part most of all.

Wow, the crossover energy on his collaborations still blows me away. I’ve watched his rise closely, and the biggest, most talked-about collab has to be with Billy Ray Cyrus on 'Old Town Road' — that remix basically launched the whole global obsession. Beyond that, he’s worked with rappers and pop stars who helped him lean into different sounds: Jack Harlow on 'Industry Baby' brought a brash hip-hop chemistry, and Doja Cat hopped on 'Scoop' to add slick pop-rap flair. He’s also flirted with country-tinged remixes and viral crossovers, like the versions of 'Old Town Road' that involved Young Thug and Mason Ramsey, which showed he’s unafraid to bend genres. On the production side, he’s teamed up with producers and songwriting partners like YoungKio (who had a hand in the original 'Old Town Road' beat) and Take a Daytrip, so his collabs aren’t just features — they’re creative partnerships. All told, his guest list reads like a genre sampler: country elders, young rappers, pop stars, and creative producers, and I love how nothing feels off-limits to him.

For portraits of XXXTentacion I usually start by collecting a handful of reference photos with different expressions and light angles. I like one crisp close-up for facial detail, one three-quarter shot for structure, and a moodier, low-light image to get the atmosphere right. From there I map basic proportions — eye line, nose base, mouth center — using light guidelines or a subtle grid. Getting those landmarks accurate is the secret sauce; once the architecture of the face is correct, likeness follows much more easily. I build the drawing in layers. First a soft tonal wash or light graphite to block in midtones, then progressively darker pencils (I reach for a 2B to 8B range) to deepen shadows and sculpt planes. For hair and skin texture I switch techniques: directional strokes and a harder pencil to suggest hair strands, soft blending and an eraser-lift for highlights on skin. His tattoos are crucial identity markers; I pay attention to scale and rhythm rather than copying every tiny line. If I’m working digitally I’ll use textured brushes and layer masks to mimic paper grit and eraser pulls. Lighting and eyes sell the emotion, so I spend extra time refining catchlights and the contrast around the iris — that’s what makes a portrait feel alive. Composition-wise I sometimes add a muted background or a faint vignette to draw focus to the face. After a few finishing touches — crisp highlights, cleaned edges, and a signature — I step back and compare with my references. When a drawing finally reads as him, there’s this real satisfaction that never gets old.