Ugh, alimony and infidelity—such a messy combo. I learned way too much about this after my best friend’s divorce. Her ex cheated, but their state was no-fault, so the judge didn’t care. The focus was purely on her needing support as a stay-at-home mom for a decade. The ex’s lawyer even argued his affair proved their marriage was 'already emotionally over,' so why should he pay extra? Brutal.
But here’s the twist: she got creative. Her attorney dug up proof he’d blown thousands on hotels and dinners during the marriage, framing it as financial misconduct. That did influence the final settlement. Judges hate wasteful spending, especially if it hurts the family’s stability. So while cheating itself might not swing alimony, the money trail it leaves behind? That can change everything.
Divorce is never just about emotions—it's a financial earthquake, and alimony is one of the aftershocks. Whether infidelity affects payments depends heavily on jurisdiction. In some states like New York, fault-based divorces consider adultery when dividing assets or awarding spousal support. If one partner drained shared funds on an affair, a judge might adjust payments to compensate. But in no-fault states like California, cheating rarely sways alimony decisions unless it directly harmed finances (e.g., spending marital money on gifts for a lover). Even then, it’s more about the economic impact than moral blame.
What fascinates me is how pop culture gets this wrong—shows like 'The Good Wife' dramatize vengeful payouts, but reality is drier. Length of marriage, income disparity, and childcare needs usually matter far more than who slept with whom. My cousin’s ex-husband had multiple affairs, but because she earned six figures as a tech lead, the court ruled she didn’t need his support. The real lesson? Always consult a local lawyer; drama won’t pay the bills.
Cheating’s impact on alimony is like a courtroom soap opera—full of 'it depends' moments. Some judges see infidelity as irrelevant; others might penalize the guilty party if the affair caused financial harm. I read a case where a spouse transferred assets to their lover, and that got the court’s attention. Mostly, though, alimony formulas focus on cold math: who earns what, who sacrificed careers for the marriage, and how long it’ll take to get back on their feet. Morality plays second fiddle unless laws explicitly allow fault considerations. Still, hiring a shark of a lawyer never hurts—sometimes they can spin betrayal into a bargaining chip.
2026-05-23 00:23:37
12
View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
Countdown to My Divorce
Tina Peach
7.2
178.3K
Rachel Lloyd had been by William Lewis' side since she was eighteen. One day, after an accident, she finally regained her hearing, which she had previously lost while saving his life.
She couldn't wait to share the good news with him. But when she arrived, she found him holding his first love in his arms and whispering sweet nothings to her.
William always knew Rachel loved him deeply—to the point she would give her life for him. She never got angry and never asked for much.
But this time, instead of quietly staying by his side, she simply signed a non-disclosure agreement. And when the time came, she completely disappeared from his world.
When William first heard that Rachel had vanished, he laughed it off.
"She'll be back within a week."
But a week passed. Then, a month. Then, three months.
And still, Rachel didn't return.
Now, as panic set in, William searched for her like a madman.
For the first time in his proud, arrogant life, he humbled himself and begged, "Rachel, stop this. It's been long enough."
Later, he added, "Come home. I'll give you whatever you want."
And finally, he said, "If I were dying… would you at least come say goodbye?"
When they met again, he was on his knees. His eyes were red-rimmed as he held out a teacup.
"Please have some tea... Aunt Rachel."
On our first wedding anniversary he told me he want a divorce.
I froze, thinking it was a joke. It wasn’t. The man I loved since I was a kid handed me papers, cold and final, like everything we shared meant nothing. I signed. I left. Packed my life into a suitcase and vanished to another state, trying to escape the pain.
But leaving didn’t stop the obsession. He’s out of his mind, searching for me, desperate to know where I am. And it’s not just him my so called best friend has been wanting him all along, smiling while she watched our love crumble, while his best friend wants me, whispers lies, and manipulates the truth to make sure he never finds me.
I thought leaving would save me. I thought I could forget. But love doesn’t let go that easy. And some mistakes are too dangerous to forgive.
He Divorced Me on Our Anniversary is a dark, emotional billionaire romance about betrayal, obsession, and fighting to survive when everyone you trusted is trying to take the one thing you can’t lose your heart.
They say when life throws you a lemon, you should turn it to a lemonade, even though some things weren't just intentional.
“For the next three years, you will work under my son, Anthony. You will obey him unconditionally and assist him in developing the first humanoid robots. It’s all stated in the contract.”
Melissa, a brilliant first-class robotics engineer, signs a binding contract to save her only sister who urgently needs surgery. Not only must she work for Anthony—the arrogant CEO of the Morgan Group—but she must also marry him.
Throughout the contract, Anthony treats her like a lowlife, belittling her at every opportunity and even stealing credit for her achievements, convinced she would never dare to leave. But as the three years draw to a close, her supposed knight in shining armor, Josh, shows up as he promised.
Will Melissa walk away from Anthony, reclaim her freedom, and rekindle the spark with Josh? Or will Anthony realize too late just how much he stands to lose when the countdown to their divorce begins?
And what if there was more to the accident that left Melissa’s sister in need of surgery—and forced Melissa into this contract?
If you want to feel first hand what it means for a lady to possess her possession, then get over here!
"Sign the papers, Zack. Three years was the deal. I’m done being your sanctuary."
Zack stared at the man who had dragged him out of the dirt and taught him how to breathe again. Nathan Durand, the crown prince of the Cocolink syndicate, stood like a monolith of ice, his silver eyes devoid of the heat that usually scorched Zack’s skin in the dark.
"Is it because of her?" Zack’s voice was a jagged glass fragment. "Because Madeline is back?"
"It’s because you’re a liability," Nathan snapped, his jaw tight enough to crack bone. "I need a partner who carries a blade, not a ghost who jumps at shadows."
THE BLURB
Broken. Sold. Silent.
Zackary Moreau spent a decade rotting in a basement, a secret prisoner of a man who used his rare bloodline as a laboratory experiment. When he finally breaks free, he doesn’t find liberty—he finds Nathan Durand. The lethal heir to the Cocolink mafia empire is everything Zack should fear: possessive, violent, and cold. But Nathan offers a bargain Zack can’t refuse: three years of marriage in exchange for a name that keeps the world at bay.
Saved. Owned. Obsessed.
For three years, they lived a lie that felt dangerously like a life. Nathan turned the shivering boy into a man of the syndicate, protecting him with a brutality that bordered on madness. But as the contract’s end date looms, the shadows return. Rival bosses want Zack’s blood, and a woman from Nathan’s past is back to claim the throne.
On the eve of their anniversary, Nathan delivers the final blow: he wants a divorce.
After I resign from a private company and move to work at an overseas company, my salary has increased by leaps and bounds.
My wife, Vivian Spencer, who's always been smart about money, suggests that I turn in all of my salary. At the same time, she will decrease my allowance.
Her reasoning is that she needs to use my salary on our family's daily expenses, so she can't spare me a single cent.
As I watch Vivian record all the expenses dutifully, I can't resist asking, "What about your salary, then?"
Vivian replies in a matter-of-fact tone, "I'm saving it up for our retirement pension."
I don't bother responding afterward. Since then, I start spending every single cent of my salary, as per Vivian's suggestion.
When Vivian notices the stream of packages being delivered to our home, she finally can't take it anymore.
Upon hearing her question, I tell her happily, "You were the one who said that my salary is meant for our family's expenses!"
Vivian exclaims in shock, "What sort of family do you think we are? As if we can afford to spend this much money every month!"
What a joke. It turns out that Vivian knows that a regular family's expenses can't possibly drain every single cent of my salary in one go.
On the third day after our divorce was finalized, my ex-wife, Georgie Anderson, sent me a text message.
[Why haven’t you transferred your salary from this month to me?]
I thought she was joking.
[We’re already divorced.]
[So? What does it matter if we’re divorced? You should transfer nineteen thousand dollars from your twenty-thousand-dollar income, just like you did before. The remaining one thousand dollars will be your pocket money. When you were unemployed, I was the one who took care of you. Now that we’re divorced, you’re turning your back on me?]
I stared at her text messages and fell silent for a really long time.
Throughout our three-year marriage, I gave her nineteen thousand dollars out of my twenty-thousand-dollar salary.
She was responsible for "budgeting" our household expenses.
However, she spent my money on her civil service exam, afternoon teas with her besties, and even on her study partner, whom I’d never met.
As for me, I handled all the house chores—cooking dinner, mopping the floors and doing the laundry. But when I took a little time after work to game, she would yell at me for being lazy.
She was demanding money from me even after we were divorced.
Her reason was that I might spend the money without thinking.
I blocked her number.
Three seconds later, she sent me a text message from another phone number.
[You’ll regret this. I’m trying to help you one last time.]
I laughed.
‘Helping me?’ I thought.
Nobody had ever helped me in the past three years.
Divorce proceedings can feel like a runaway train, but there are ways to hit the brakes—or even reverse course if both parties are willing. I've seen couples reconcile during the mandatory waiting periods some states require, using that time for counseling or honest conversations. The legal process varies by jurisdiction, but generally, either spouse can file a motion to dismiss the petition if they change their minds before the final judgment. Some courts even offer 'cooling-off' periods specifically designed to give couples space to reconsider.
What fascinates me is how often pop culture gets this wrong—shows like 'The Good Wife' make it seem irreversible after filing, but real life is messier. I knew one couple who withdrew their petition three times before finally divorcing years later. The emotional whiplash of on-again, off-again filings was brutal, but it proved the system does allow for second chances—if both people want them.
Divorce during pregnancy adds layers of complexity to alimony discussions, and I’ve seen friends navigate this. Courts often prioritize the well-being of the unborn child, which can influence spousal support rulings. Some judges may factor in the pregnant spouse’s reduced earning capacity due to maternity leave or health considerations. It’s not just about current needs—future childcare costs might informally weigh into decisions too.
From what I’ve gathered, outcomes vary wildly by jurisdiction. In some places, temporary support increases during pregnancy are common, while others strictly adhere to pre-divorce income calculations. The emotional toll complicates negotiations—I remember one couple where mediation stalled because the stress overshadowed practical financial planning.
Divorce is never easy, especially when kids are involved. I’ve seen friends go through this, and the way custody gets decided can feel like a rollercoaster. Courts usually focus on what’s best for the child, but if one parent’s behavior during the marriage—like neglect or instability—comes up in the divorce proceedings, it can sway things. For example, if a parent was rarely around or had substance issues, the other might get more custody time. It’s not just about who ‘wins’ the divorce; it’s about who can provide a stable home.
That said, courts also look at current circumstances. A parent might’ve had flaws during the marriage but could’ve gotten help since then. I remember a case where a dad who used to work crazy hours rearranged his schedule to be more present, and that made a difference. It’s messy, but the kid’s needs always come first. In the end, it’s less about ‘counting’ faults and more about who can step up now.
From my understanding, remarriage can definitely shake things up when it comes to alimony. I’ve seen friends go through this—when someone who’s receiving spousal support decides to tie the knot again, the courts often see it as a sign they no longer need that financial help. It’s like the system assumes their new partner will pick up the slack. But it’s not always black and white. Some states have nuances, like if the payments were lump-sum or modifiable.
What’s wild is how much it varies by location. In some places, remarriage automatically cuts off alimony, no questions asked. Others might require the paying spouse to file a motion to stop payments. And then there’s cohabitation—some states treat long-term partners the same as remarriage, which can lead to messy legal battles. It’s one of those things where you really need to check local laws or consult a lawyer, because the fine print matters more than you’d think.