When Did Desires Crossword Clue First Appear In Major Newspapers?

Hungry for a quick hint, I usually head to the big clue databases first — sites like OneAcross, Wordplays, Crossword Nexus and Crossword Solver are where I start. I type in the clue 'desires' along with any pattern of letters I have (like ETS or WISH ) and they spit out synonyms, plural forms, and common crossword answers. I also check Merriam-Webster or Chambers online to confirm obscure senses; British puzzles love slightly different words than American ones. If I'm stuck on a theme puzzle or suspect wordplay, I dig into Cruciverb/XWordInfo and the Cruciverb clue database to see how constructors have used similar clues before. Reddit's r/crossword and the classics like 'Crossword Fiend' blog are gold for solver discussions and alternate readings. For mobile, the Crossword Nexus app and the Wordplays mobile site have handy pattern searches. Besides raw lookup, I sometimes use anagram solvers or a reverse dictionary to catch verbs vs. nouns — 'desires' can map to 'WANTS', 'YENS', 'YEARNINGS' (rare), or 'LICHES' if you're in a weird constructor's mood. It’s satisfying when a little research flips a stubborn grid; I usually feel jazzed and ready for the next one.

That clue always tickles my brain: 'desires'. When I see that in the NYT grid I immediately consider part of speech and letter count before anything else. If it's five letters, my first instinct is 'wants' — it's clean, common in crosswords, and fits both noun and verb senses. I explain to myself that puzzle constructors love versatile fills; 'wants' works whether the clue is plural noun or third-person singular verb context, and it tiles nicely with short crossings. If the pattern is six letters, I slide toward 'yearns' or 'craves' depending on crossings. 'Yearns' carries a wistful tone and often pairs with literary crossing words, whereas 'craves' has a more visceral feel. Less common possibilities like 'lusts' or 'longs for' (which might be two words) pop up too, but I usually try 'wants' first in a five-letter slot. In short, my go-to is 'wants' most of the time, and that little victory always makes me grin.

Stumbling into a cryptic with the clue 'desires' lights me up every time because it's one of those definitions that hides so many friendly little synonyms. I usually start by thinking of short, common words a setter would love: 'wants' (5), 'yens' (4) and 'longs' (5) are my go-tos. 'Yens' is especially fun — it's compact, slightly literary, and a favourite in British-style puzzles. Beyond that, 'craves' (6), 'yearns' (6) and 'lusts' (5) crop up when a clue needs a stronger or more specific sense. When I'm building a grid mentally I also consider surface and wordplay. 'Desires' can be the straight definition, but it can also be disguised in a double definition, or be clued by an anagram/misdirection. For a hidden clue you might see something like "seasON S FOR dinner" hiding 'onsfor' — okay, that's silly, but setters love nesting letters. Practical tip: if the enumeration is short, reach first for 'yens' or 'wants'; if it's longer, try 'yearns', 'craves' or 'wishes'. I often jot down all likely synonyms and try them against crossing letters. That saves time and keeps me from getting tunnel vision. Personally, when I see 'desires' in a puzzle, 'wants' is the instant feel — reliable, flexible, and oddly comforting.

I get a kick out of little language choices in puzzles, and this one is a classic: 'desires' is often clued as 'wants' because they're basically conversational synonyms and crosswords love straightforward, familiar wording. When a grid entry is something like DESIRES (7) the setter can lean on the simple present-tense verb 'wants' as a direct, unornamented clue that most solvers will snap to. It's clean and avoids the risk of sounding pretentious or overly poetic. Beyond plain synonymy, there's a technical bit that matters to constructors and editors: clue length and tone. 'Wants' is short, common, and versatile — it reads naturally in both verb and noun senses. That flexibility makes it a reliable clue across difficulty levels. Plus, for themed puzzles or restraint-heavy grids, keeping clues concise allows the surface to stay smooth and the solving experience satisfying. On a personal note, I like that tiny economy of language. A two-syllable clue like 'wants' matches the solver's pace and feels human, not like a dictionary grab. It’s a little design choice that makes the whole puzzle friendlier, and I always appreciate that kind of thoughtful simplicity.