2 Jawaban2026-02-09 08:04:55
The fusion of Goku and Vegeta is one of those iconic moments in 'Dragon Ball' that fans can't stop talking about. While Vegito (the Potara fusion) and Gogeta (the Fusion Dance) are both technically canon, their appearances in the main storyline are a bit different. Vegito first appeared during the Buu Saga in the original manga, which is undeniably canon. Gogeta, on the other hand, debuted in the non-canon movie 'Fusion Reborn,' but later became canon when he showed up in 'Dragon Ball Super: Broly,' which is part of the official timeline.
The distinction between canon and non-canon can get messy in 'Dragon Ball,' especially with so many movies and spin-offs. But if we stick to the manga and 'Dragon Ball Super,' both fusions have their place. Vegito’s role in the Buu Saga was crucial, and Gogeta’s fight against Broly was absolutely breathtaking. It’s fascinating how fusion has evolved from a desperate last-resort tactic to a celebrated spectacle. Personally, I love how these fusions highlight the rivalry and eventual camaraderie between Goku and Vegeta—they’re stronger together, even if they’d never admit it willingly.
5 Jawaban2026-02-09 07:34:58
Man, this question takes me back to my teenage years when I used to obsessively debate 'Dragon Ball Z' lore with friends. 'Dragon Ball Z: Second Coming' is actually a fan-made story, not part of the official Toriyama canon. It's one of those creative alternate universe tales that fans crafted, imagining what could happen if certain events unfolded differently. I remember stumbling upon it years ago and being impressed by how well some fans captured the spirit of the series, even if it wasn't official.
That said, it's worth checking out if you're into fan fiction and alternate takes. The creativity in the fan community can be amazing, even if it doesn't carry the weight of canon. Just don't expect it to tie into 'Super' or any official sequels—it's purely for fun!
4 Jawaban2025-10-19 09:34:48
The world of 'Dragon Ball' is such an exhilarating place filled with epic battles, powerful transformations, and unforgettable characters! However, when it comes to the movies, especially for this franchise, it’s important to navigate through the differentiations between what's considered canon and what’s not. Most of the films, particularly the earlier ones, have a reputation for being non-canonical, which can sometimes lead to confusion among fans.
Take the first film, 'Dragon Ball: Curse of the Blood Rubies.' It’s this whimsical retelling of Goku's early adventure, heavily laden with creative liberties that stray from the original manga storyline. While it's entertaining, it doesn’t quite fit within the established timeline of the series. Similarly, the follow-up movies like 'Dragon Ball: Sleeping Princess in Devil’s Castle' and 'Dragon Ball: The Legend of Shenron' also divert from canonical content, presenting alternate adventures that don't affect the primary narrative.
Fast forward to the 'Dragon Ball Z' era, and you still find plenty of films that exist outside the established canon. Notably, movies like 'Dragon Ball Z: Broly – The Legendary Super Saiyan' and 'Dragon Ball Z: The World's Strongest' feature characters and plotlines that don’t align with the main story arcs. They’re brimming with action and dramatic moments, but the events are often disregarded in favor of the series’ timeline.
What’s fascinating, though, is that some of these non-canonical films have become cult favorites! For instance, many fans adore 'Dragon Ball Z: Fusion Reborn,' which introduces the fun and powerful character of Gogeta. It’s hard not to get pumped during those epic fights, even if they don’t officially count. The same goes for 'Dragon Ball Z: Battle of Gods' and 'Dragon Ball Z: Resurrection 'F',' which are effectively embedded in the canon timeline but also offer some distinct storytelling elements that branch out from the original narratives.
Reflecting on it all, the movies really do offer a buffet of 'Dragon Ball' entertainment! Even if some of them skirt around the established canon, they still pack a punch with their vibrant animation, unique storylines, and of course, the iconic power-ups and transformations. Dive into them with an open mind, and just enjoy the ride! After all, isn’t that what the world of anime is all about – celebrating creativity and the joy of storytelling?
4 Jawaban2025-11-25 23:24:06
A lot of fans toss this question around during debates at conventions and online, and I always lean into the simple side: yes, Tien is canon. He was created by Akira Toriyama and appears in the original 'Dragon Ball' manga, which is the baseline for what's considered the main continuity. His arc starting as an antagonist, training under the Crane School, teaming up with Chiaotzu, and later becoming a reliable human ally is laid out in the manga pages, so that cements his canonical status in the franchise.
That said, the word 'canon' in this universe gets messy fast. The anime sometimes adds filler or side-stories that aren't in the manga, and various movies and games live in their own continuity bubbles. When something is directly from Toriyama's manga or he officially supervised it, it sits safest in the canon pile. I still love watching the anime-only bits where Tien gets extra face-time, but for strict continuity I always point back to the manga — and I appreciate him even more for being one of the few humans who keeps up with the big hitters, in spirit if not always in power.
4 Jawaban2026-02-07 14:30:32
Dragon Ball Z's movie canon is a tricky topic, and honestly, it depends on how strict you want to be about it. The general consensus among fans is that most of the films aren’t canon to the main series, since they often contradict the manga or don’t fit into the timeline neatly. However, 'Battle of Gods' and 'Resurrection F' are exceptions—they were later adapted into the 'Dragon Ball Super' anime, which makes them part of the official storyline.
That said, even non-canon movies like 'Broly: The Legendary Super Saiyan' or 'Fusion Reborn' have a special place in fans' hearts. They might not 'count' in the grand scheme of things, but they’re packed with iconic moments and wild fights that make them worth watching. If you’re a completionist, you’ll have fun with all of them, but if you’re sticking strictly to canon, those two Super-era films are your go-tos.
3 Jawaban2026-02-07 08:43:24
Dragon Ball Xenoverse is such a wild ride for fans because it dances around the edges of canon in the most intriguing way. The game introduces time travel and alternate timelines, which let characters like Trunks and the Time Patrol interact in ways that don't directly contradict the main story but also don't neatly fit into it. Toriyama had some involvement in the game's concept, which gives it a semi-official flavor, but it's more of a 'what if' playground than a core part of the saga.
That said, the original 'Dragon Ball' and 'Z' timelines remain untouched by Xenoverse's events. The game's lore is self-contained, focusing on fixing disruptions caused by villains messing with history. It's a clever way to revisit iconic moments—like the Saiyan or Cell arcs—without rewriting them. For me, that's the charm: it's a love letter to the franchise, not a new chapter. If you're craving fresh fights or nostalgia with a twist, Xenoverse delivers, but don't expect its story to show up in the manga or anime.
3 Jawaban2026-02-10 05:34:17
Man, the whole 'canon' debate in 'Dragon Ball' is such a rabbit hole, isn't it? The Broly movie situation is especially messy because there are two versions of him—the original 'Broly: The Legendary Super Saiyan' from the '90s, which was definitely non-canon filler, and the 2018 'Dragon Ball Super: Broly,' which Toriyama himself wrote the script for. That one’s 100% canon since it ties directly into 'Super' lore, introducing Broly as a Saiyan survivor with a totally revamped backstory. The animation is insane, too—that fight scene where Goku and Vegeta fuse into Gogeta? Pure eye candy.
But yeah, if you’re talking about the older Broly movies, those are just fun side stories. The new one? Absolute must-watch for timeline sticklers. It even sets up future arcs with Frieza’s weird interest in Broly. I love how it fleshes out Saiyan history without retconning too much.
4 Jawaban2026-04-14 23:18:03
Dragon Ball Multiverse is this wild fan-made project that totally hooked me when I first stumbled upon it. The art style mimics the original 'Dragon Ball' vibe so well, and the idea of parallel universes colliding in a tournament? Brilliant fan service. But here’s the thing—it’s not officially tied to Akira Toriyama’s work. It’s like finding an amazing cover band that nails the sound but isn’t the real deal. The creators, Gogeta Jr. and Salagir, even stress it’s non-canon, though they weave in some deep-cut lore that feels respectful to the source material.
That said, I adore how it explores 'what if' scenarios (like Goku’s heart virus actually killing him) or resurrects forgotten characters. It’s a love letter to fans who crave more 'Dragon Ball' chaos without studio constraints. While it’ll never replace 'Super' or the original manga, it’s a blast to discuss in forums—just don’t expect Toyotarou to reference it anytime soon.
4 Jawaban2026-04-25 11:33:14
The Shadow Dragons Saga is one of those arcs that really splits the fandom down the middle when it comes to canonicity. From my perspective, it's part of 'Dragon Ball GT,' which itself occupies a weird gray area. Akira Toriyama wasn't directly involved in GT's production, unlike the original manga or 'Dragon Ball Super,' so purists often dismiss it. But here's the thing: GT had its own charm, and the Shadow Dragons were a fascinating concept—tying the abuse of the Dragon Balls directly back to the characters as a consequence of their wishes.
That said, if we're talking strict canon, 'Dragon Ball Super' overwrites GT entirely. The timelines don't align, and Super's events like the Tournament of Power or the introduction of new universes don't acknowledge GT's existence. But canon debates aside, I still love the Shadow Dragons Saga for its emotional weight—especially Syn Shenron's final battle with Goku. It feels like a poetic end to the Dragon Ball mythos, even if it's not 'official.'
3 Jawaban2026-06-23 04:47:57
Dragon Ball M is one of those weird little side stories that makes you scratch your head about where it fits in the grand scheme of things. It’s not part of the original manga by Akira Toriyama, nor is it referenced in the main anime adaptations like 'Dragon Ball Z' or 'Dragon Ball Super.' The story revolves around a cursed armor that turns people into demons, which feels more like a standalone horror-tinged spinoff than something that slots neatly into the Saiyan saga or the battles against Frieza.
That said, fans love debating its canonicity because it’s got that classic Toriyama art style and some wild concepts. But unless there’s an official statement tying it to the main timeline—like how 'Dragon Ball GT' occupies a fuzzy gray area—it’s safer to treat 'Dragon Ball M' as a fun what-if story. It’s got the vibe of those old-school OVAs where the creators just went nuts with experimental ideas, and honestly, that’s part of its charm. If you’re a completionist, it’s worth checking out, but don’t lose sleep over where it fits in the power scaling debates.