Ever notice how existentialists make everything feel both heavier and lighter? Like when Sartre says we’re 'condemned to be free,' it’s a gut punch. Society offers ready-made identities—parent, employee, patriot—but existentialism insists we’re always choosing, even when we pretend otherwise. That’s the real challenge: it removes the safety net of 'everyone else does it.' Take marriage. Norms say it’s love’s ultimate expression, but existentialism asks: Is it your expression, or are you acting out a rom-com script? This philosophy doesn’t give answers; it makes the questions unavoidable. And once you start asking, norms stop feeling solid—they feel like suggestions written in sand.
The beauty of existential philosophy is how it turns societal norms into open debates. Take something as basic as retirement. Society frames it as the ultimate reward—work hard now, relax later. But Heidegger’s concept of 'being-toward-death' flips that. If life’s finite, why defer joy to your 60s? Suddenly, norms around delayed gratification look less like wisdom and more like fear. I saw this play out with my uncle, who saved relentlessly for retirement but died months after leaving his job. Existentialism would’ve asked him: Did you ever stop to define 'enough'? It’s ruthless with norms around success, too. Nietzsche’s 'will to power' isn’t about climbing corporate ladders—it’s about creating your own definition of power. When a billionaire and a monk both claim fulfillment, who’s right? Existentialism says: Decide for yourself, but know why.
Existential philosophy hits like a ton of bricks when you realize how much it questions the 'default settings' of life. Society hands us scripts—go to school, get a job, marry, retire—but thinkers like Camus or Sartre rip up those scripts and ask, 'Why?' I remember reading 'The Myth of Sisyphus' and feeling equal parts terrified and liberated. Camus doesn’t just challenge norms; he mocks the absurdity of blindly following them. The idea that life might have no inherent meaning sounds bleak, but it’s weirdly empowering. If nothing matters by default, then every choice—rejecting a soul-crushing job, defying gender roles, even something as small as wearing pajamas to the grocery store—becomes a tiny rebellion.
What fascinates me is how existentialism doesn’t just critique societal norms—it weaponizes personal freedom against them. Take Simone de Beauvoir’s 'The Second Sex.' She didn’t just analyze patriarchal norms; she exposed how women internalize them, turning oppression into a 'natural' state. Existentialism forces you to confront the uncomfortable truth: norms aren’t laws. They’re choices we’ve stopped questioning. And once you see that, you can’t unsee it. Every 'should' starts to sound like peer pressure from a bunch of dead people.
Existential philosophy’s like that friend who won’t let you get away with lazy answers. Society says, 'Be productive!' and existentialism whispers, 'Says who?' It’s not about rejecting norms outright—it’s about demanding they justify themselves. Kierkegaard’s whole thing about 'authenticity' nails this. If you’re religious because your family is, or avoid art because it’s 'impractical,' are you really living or just performing? This stuff gets spicy when applied to modern hustle culture. Why grind 80 hours a week for a promotion if you haven’t asked whether prestige actually matters to you? The challenge isn’t just intellectual; it’s emotional. Realizing you’ve spent years chasing goals you never chose is terrifying. But that’s the point: existentialism doesn’t comfort. It provokes.
2026-04-27 19:55:47
23
View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
The madness of life
Виталий Кириллов
0
3.4K
In the madness of life, we find the madness of life in ourselves. We are a reflection of the madness of life. We are the embodiment of a crazy life.
Have you ever dreaded living a lifeless life? If not, you probably don't know how excruciating such an existence is. That is what Rue Mallory's life. A life without a meaning. Imagine not wanting to wake up every morning but also not wanting to go to sleep at night. No will to work, excitement to spend, no friends' company to enjoy, and no reason to continue living.
How would an eighteen-year old girl live that kind of life?
Yes, her life is clearly depressing. That's exactly what you end up feeling without a phone purpose in life. She's alive but not living. There's a huge and deep difference between living, surviving, and being alive. She's not dead, but a ghost with a beating heart.
But she wanted to feel alive, to feel what living is. She hoped, wished, prayed but it didn't work. She still remained lifeless. Not until, he came and introduce her what really living is.
Anya Moore is a pop sensation with lots of people who look up to her, though her passion is something else. Sadie Ozoa wants to chase her dreams and doesn’t want to take no for an answer, but it feels like she doesn’t have a choice. But unexpected decisions they made had created unfaithful circumstances that have brought two different individuals together. Next unthinkable move: run as far away from the situation that could have led to their wishes.
They don’t know how they ended up walking together and they don’t know why. But all they want to do is to escape from the environment they were surrounded in. Anya and Sadie thought they would be distant but with every step they took, they started to know so much about each other and what they have one thing in common: they hated how the world has become. They then thought what if they rebuild Earth where it is all ruled by them--and only both of them. The two then thought what if we start to make it a reality?
As they go on the journey to create their own world, Anya sees that Sadie is more than an outcast and Sadie sees that Anya is more than just a star--they are each other’s world.
But with the world that is against their odds, will they be able to show their truth?
In this first debut comes a coming-of-age story about realizing that in order to survive the world, you must choose whether to follow the rules or break them for the sake of doing something right.
WARNING ️: this book may contain steamy and sexual content Which is strictly not for kids under 18.
"Nathaan....." I screamed as I felt his huge cap at the entrance of my womanhood. Hello didn't give a damn about me as he pressed deeper into my wet pussy. My v walls pulsated around the root of his big cock while he kept pushing inside of me. " Pleaseeee Nathan, you're hard on meeeee" I managed to speak out trying to pull his hips away from mine, rather he retracted his hip and thrusted it dick fully, deeper, stretching me wider enough to accommodate his position.
Nathan is a young, handsome, famous musician who lives happily single not until he was diagnosed with a terminal illness that made him bury his life in alcohol and sex. He believes that women are created for sex only and love comes with money. Not until he met a nurse, Eva meadows who isn't moved by his wealth or fame or even his physical looks but all she wishes for is to find true love, not the kind she had with Henry— her boyfriend. Now Eva works as Nathan's personal nurse, what neither of them expects is to fall in love.
Not the kind that saves you—but the kind that changes you. He taught her how to feel. She taught him how to live.
Now, as time slips away, they must face one impossible truth:
Can you really learn to live… when you’re running out of time to love?
When I loved her, I didn't understand what true love was. When I lost her, I had time for her. I was emptied just when I was full of love. Speechless! Life took her to death while I explored the outside world within. Sad trauma of losing her. I am going to miss her in a perfectly impossible world for us. I also note my fight with death as a cause of extreme departure in life. Enjoy!
When he and his father eventually decide to begin a new life after his mom and sister's death, Praxis Cohen, a suicidal teenager with an expressionless visage on his face, finds himself in a huge, formidable laboratory where teenagers like him are being injected a drug of which the effect is still unknown. Fortunate enough, his body can withstand the drug that leads him to be declared by Dr. Conscire as the first patient to have successfully passed the First Stage of the experiment in this generation.
As he proceeds to the Second Stage, Dr. Conscire, the president of the organization, decides to release him off the laboratory to find out that the effect of the drug enables him to read minds and do psychokinesis that sets his mind into chaos.
In his debacle as an experimented guinea pig of the nameless organization, realizing that he is not alone in this experiment, Praxis meets new marvelous people to discover the origin of the experiment, the reason why they turned into supernormal beings, the connection of this experiment to the unborn world war in the future, the twists and turns of their past stories, and to discern the next stages of the experiment. With the collaborative effort of their team, they strive to choose the best course of action to put an end to this fight.
Existential philosophy hits close to home for me because it doesn’t just hand you a pre-packaged meaning—it forces you to wrestle with the messy, uncomfortable reality of creating your own. Thinkers like Camus and Sartre didn’t sugarcoat things; they argued life has no inherent purpose, and that’s terrifying but also liberating. When I read 'The Myth of Sisyphus,' that image of endlessly pushing a boulder up a hill resonated. It’s not about the futility—it’s about choosing to find joy in the push.
What fascinates me is how existentialism intersects with art. Films like 'Ikiru' or books like 'The Unbearable Lightness of Being' show characters staring into the void and deciding to dance anyway. It’s not about grand answers—it’s about small, stubborn acts of defiance. My favorite part? Existentialism makes room for absurdity. Laughing at the chaos while still caring deeply? That’s the human condition in a nutshell.
Ever since I stumbled upon Camus' 'The Myth of Sisyphus' during a particularly rough patch, I've been fascinated by how existential philosophy doesn't just ponder life's big questions—it throws you into them headfirst. At first, the idea that life might lack inherent meaning terrified me. But weirdly, sitting with that discomfort became liberating. If nothing matters objectively, then everything matters subjectively—my choices, my relationships, my tiny joys. It transformed anxiety from a looming monster into something almost... collaborative? Like, yeah, existence is absurd, but that means my struggles aren't personal failures—they're part of the human condition.
Reading Kierkegaard's concept of 'leap of faith' later reshaped this further. His embrace of uncertainty mirrored my therapy sessions about tolerating ambiguity. Now when anxiety flares, I imagine it as Kierkegaard's knight of faith—terrified but choosing to act anyway. It doesn't eliminate physiological symptoms, but it gives the panic context. Beauvoir's ethics of ambiguity added another layer: if we're constantly becoming, then anxious what-ifs are just growing pains. These thinkers became my unexpected anxiety toolkit—not by providing answers, but by making the questions feel less lonely.
Wandering through a bookstore last week, I stumbled upon a battered copy of 'The Myth of Sisyphus' by Camus, and it struck me how often these big, messy existential questions bubble up in everyday life. Like when I’m doomscrolling at 2 AM or zoning out during a tedious work meeting, that nagging 'What’s the point?' creeps in. But here’s the twist: modern media actually grapples with this constantly. Shows like 'BoJack Horseman' or games like 'Disco Elysium' dress existential dread in neon colors and witty dialogue, making it palatable for a generation raised on memes. Even TikTok philosophers (yes, they exist) distill Kierkegaard into 60-second clips between dance trends.
What fascinates me is how ancient questions about meaning now intersect with digital burnout and climate anxiety. The tools have changed—we debate Sartre in Discord servers instead of Parisian cafés—but the core tension remains. Maybe that’s why vintage existential works feel freshly urgent; they’re survival guides for an era where 'authenticity' is both a corporate buzzword and a radical act. Personally, I find comfort in the chaos—if nothing matters, at least I can enjoy this weird slice of time where we’re all confused together.