Why Is Informer Crossword Clue Sometimes 'Stoolie'?

That tiny clue 'informer' is one of those little traps that makes me grin and groan at the same time. My default fill for short crosswords is usually 'rat'—three letters, blunt, and used so often it's almost crossword shorthand. If the grid wants four letters, I lean toward 'fink' or 'tatt' (if it's playful), and for longer slots 'snitch' (6), 'informant' (8), or 'stoolie' (7) often fit. If the puzzle's from the UK, don't forget 'grass' or 'nark'—British setters love those. For cryptic puzzles the setter might be more sly: 'sings' could be clued by 'informer' (as in 'to sing' = to inform), so verb forms can appear rather than nouns. Crosses are king. A lot of solvers panic at the clue but once a couple of crossing letters are in, the right fill jumps out. I like how this clue showcases regional vocabulary and setter style; it keeps every puzzle fresh and a little cheeky.

I love how the little word 'informer' can be a treasure chest for cryptic setters and solvers alike. In my puzzles, 'informer' will often be the straight definition at one end of the clue, pointing you to synonyms like RAT, SNOOP, NARK, GRASS, or TELL‑TALE. That simple reading is super common: a short double definition such as 'Rodent or betrayer (3)' gives RAT straightaway. But setters relish disguise: you'll see 'informer' clued by wordplay — hidden words, containers, anagrams and charades are all fair game. For example, a hidden indicator like 'in' can hide 'spy' inside a longer phrase, or a container indicator like 'holding' might put RAT inside another word. I also enjoy the British flavour — 'grass' or 'nark' appear frequently — and the setter might use slang or surface misdirection to steer you away. Spotting the definition (usually at an end) and then testing for hidden words, reversal indicators, or synonyms is my go-to approach; it turns a baffling clue into a satisfying little reveal. Feels like detective work every time, honestly.

On my daily puzzle habit, I’ve noticed that setters love short, punchy synonyms for 'informer' because they fit tidy grids and are easy to clue. The three-letter classic is 'rat' — brutal, compact and utterly crossword-friendly. For four letters you'll often see 'narc' or 'fink'; both carry slightly different flavors (one cops-on-drugs, the other squeals generally), and clue writers exploit that nuance. When the grid allows six or seven letters, 'snitch' and 'squealer' pop up; they're more conversational and let setters play with surface readings. Across different outlets there's regional variety: British puzzles like 'grass' or 'stoolie' more than US papers, and cryptic setters might use 'mole' for an undercover informer. I always scan crossings for a vowel pattern first — a lot of these synonyms have very predictable letter shapes — and that little trick saves me from getting tangled by lookalike options. It’s oddly satisfying to see how a single clue can lead to 'rat', 'narc', 'fink' or 'snitch' depending on tone and enumeration — it keeps me hooked and smiling at the setter’s cheeky choices.

Here's the scoop: in cryptic crosswords the clue 'sully' often points to the short answer 'mar' simply because the two words are direct synonyms. I get a little giddy when a three-letter reveal like that snaps into place — 'sully' and 'mar' both mean to damage, tarnish, or spoil, so setters frequently use 'sully' as the straight definition part of a clue when the grid needs MAR. Cryptic clues usually have two parts, a definition and some sort of wordplay, and with tiny answers like MAR it’s pleasingly economical for setters to use one as the definition and the other half of the clue to do the work. For example, a clue like Sully, backing animal (3) would work perfectly: the definition is 'Sully', and the wordplay is 'backing animal' meaning reverse 'ram' to get 'mar'. That neat reversal is one of those little aha moments I live for when solving. Beyond that obvious route, 'sully' can appear in several cryptic roles, which is why you might see it pop up in different-looking clues but still end up with MAR. Sometimes it's the definition and the wordplay gives MAR in a compact way (hidden words, reversals, initial letters). Other times setters will use 'sully' as part of the surface sense while the real definition is at the other end; cryptic surfaces are written to read like natural language, so words that logically belong to the literal meaning can mask where the true definition sits. Another neat trick: because 'sully' implies damage or spoiling, some setters will use it as a subtle instruction to 'damage' or scramble letters — an informal anagram indicator — although that's less common and you have to be careful, because not every setter likes those loose usages. Still, thinking flexibly about where the definition might be, and whether 'sully' is being literal or playful, will save you a lot of head-scratching. If you're hunting MAR in a puzzle, keep a few solver habits in mind. Check the enumeration — a (3) pretty much screams MAR as a possibility if 'sully' figures in the surface. Look for reversals (RAM back), hidden answers (consecutive letters spanning words), or initial/terminal-letter devices that yield M-A-R. Also remember that many common verbs meaning damage or tarnish show up as short answers because three letters are easy to slot in across the grid. I still get a kick when a clue that read like a juicy little mini-story suddenly boils down to MAR; it feels tidy, clever, and a bit mischievous, and that's exactly why I keep coming back to cryptics for the tiny victories.

I get a kick out of spotting the little synonyms for 'informer' that pop up across British newspapers' cryptic pages. When I'm doing the weekend cryptic in a coffee shop, the clue 'informer' will usually be the straight definition part of a clue and the solver's brain immediately starts listing suspects: 'grass', 'rat', 'nark', 'fink', 'stoolie' and occasionally longer entries like 'supergrass'. Those feel very British in tone, and you'll see them across the usual broadsheets and mid-market papers with cryptic grids. Technically, 'informer' is most common in cryptic crosswords rather than quick definitions or themed variety puzzles. Setters rely on that simple one-word definition because it pairs well with all sorts of wordplay — hidden words, charades and containers. For example, a setter might hide a synonym inside a phrase, or put together letter chunks that look innocent on the surface. I love that mix of slang and craft: you learn both language color and setter tricks at once. It makes finding 'grass' or 'rat' feel like catching a tiny cultural wink from the puzzle-maker, and I always grin when I spot them.

Bright thought: if the crossword wants a six-letter word for an informer, my go-to is 'SNITCH'. I like this one because it's common in both American and casual British puzzles and fits a straightforward 6-letter slot. If the pattern you have has known letters, try to line them up with S-N-I-T-C-H. For example, ?N?T?H would pretty much lock it in as 'SNITCH'. That said, crosswords can be cheeky with register. If the clue feels more slangy or prison-themed, 'CANARY' can pop up (prison slang for someone who sings to the authorities). If the clue leans formal, though, the puzzle might avoid slang and use a different construction. I usually check intersecting letters and whether the clue is jokey or literal — that normally confirms it for me. Feels satisfying when the crosses click into place, and 'SNITCH' often provides that snap.

If a clue raises my hackles, I run through a little mental checklist before I hit send to the editor. First, I verify it's actually wrong or harmful rather than merely tricky: check the crossings in the published grid, confirm enumeration and spelling, and do a quick web search for obscure facts. If the clue is a factual error (dates, names, science), a misprint (wrong enumeration, missing letter), or impossible to solve because of a bad crossing, that's already worthy of contact. Equally important are clues that push into hate speech, slurs, defamatory assertions, or content that targets protected groups — those deserve prompt reporting. When I do report, I include precise details: publication date, puzzle number or page, the clue text and the grid square(s) affected, and a screenshot if possible. I stay civil, explain why the clue is problematic, and, if I can, suggest a corrected reading or source. Doing this feels like keeping the hobby healthy; editors usually appreciate accurate, calm flags, and I sleep better knowing I did my bit.

I love how a single word can do so much heavy lifting in a clue — 'pinnacle' is one of those gems. In cryptic puzzles it often acts as the straight definition part of the clue, pointing to tidy little synonyms like APEX, ACME, TOP, or SPIRE. Those short synonyms are gold for setters because they fit grids cleanly and give solvers a compact target to work toward. Beyond the straight definition, 'pinnacle' is great for surface misdirection. A clue might read like a bit of scenery or drama — "pinnacle of the chapel" — steering you to architectural terms such as 'spire' rather than a metaphorical high point. Setters also exploit double meanings: sometimes the whole clue can be read as a whimsical definition while separate wordplay builds the same answer. I enjoy spotting when a seemingly lofty sentence is secretly a neat piece of wordplay; it feels like finding a tiny summit in the puzzle, and it makes me grin every time.

Flipping through a Sunday grid, I often notice the way a clue like "omnipotent" is handled feels like a tiny etiquette test between setter and solver. For easier, American-style puzzles you'll usually see it clued very directly — synonyms like 'almighty' (8) or 'all-powerful' used as straightforward definitions. Editors are careful about length, so you might instead get 'all-powerful deity' which hints at 'GOD' or 'THE LORD' in shorter slots. In themed puzzles the concept can be disguised: an entry might be split across theme answers, hidden in a long phrase, or reinterpreted as a pop-culture nod. In British-style cryptics the setter gets playful. A clean anagram is common: 'Potent, I'm no (10)' is a neat cryptic that literally scrambles 'POTENT IM NO' into 'OMNIPOTENT'. Other cryptic devices include hidden-word clues, whimsical surface readings, or charade clues that build the word from Latin roots like 'omni-' (all) + 'potent' (powerful). I love seeing that mix of linguistic craft and crossword fairness — it makes solving feel like a small victory every time.

Publishers sometimes slip a suspicious crossword clue into print on purpose, and I find that practice oddly satisfying — it's like a tiny act of deliberate mischief hidden inside the paper. Often it's meant to be a canary: a clue so specific or oddly phrased that if someone lifts it wholesale for another outlet or a syndicated feed, the publisher can spot that theft immediately. I've seen examples where a single, unusual name or improbable phrase surfaces elsewhere and suddenly the trail to a leak becomes clear. Beyond the anti-plagiarism angle, there's also theater involved. A deliberately weird entry can be an editor's joke with loyal solvers, or a safety valve when a real answer would be defamatory, legally risky, or simply impossible to confirm. Sometimes it's a tracer — think of webbing tags used in photo agencies — and sometimes it's an easter egg for followers of a columnist. I enjoy imagining the tiny meetings where someone says, 'Let's slip this in and see what happens.' It makes the whole newspaper feel a touch more human and conspiratorial, which I like.