3 Answers2026-07-26 02:01:04
I love a series that isn't afraid to let its protagonist be unlikeable. Rebus is a terrible boyfriend, a neglectful father, a difficult colleague, and a borderline alcoholic. Yet, you root for him because of his dogged pursuit of justice for the voiceless. That complexity is built over many books. If you met him in a later installment, you might just see a grumpy old man. But seeing his younger, slightly more hopeful self first, and watching life grind him down, creates a profound empathy. Order builds that character arc deliberately.
5 Answers2026-07-24 08:19:59
The podcast 'It's Crime Time, Baby!' did a whole episode on this. Their verdict was unanimous: start with 'Knots and Crosses'. They argued that missing it is like starting 'Breaking Bad' in season two—you miss the foundational trauma.
2 Answers2026-07-26 07:19:12
I see a lot of people asking about the reading order. For the John Rain series, the publication order is king. That means beginning with 'Rain Fall'. Eisler developed the character's backstory and world incrementally, and later books reference events from earlier ones.
Trying to read them out of sequence might leave you confused about his evolving relationships and the ongoing consequences of his actions. The emotional weight of later books depends on knowing where he started.
3 Answers2026-07-26 16:38:19
I like to imagine the timeline from the perspective of the minor characters. The junkies, the informants, the small-time crooks who see Rebus every few years. To them, he's this constant, slightly more worn-down face appearing with questions. His career, from their view, is just this man aging on the job, becoming part of the furniture of the city's underbelly.
6 Answers2026-07-26 03:29:47
I don’t have a dog in this fight. I tried one, thought it was okay, but preferred the more stripped-down detective novels from earlier eras. Just not my jam. But I respect the dedication of the fandom! The order debates are half the fun for you all, I’m sure.
3 Answers2026-07-26 14:30:35
Reading order debates are fun, but they can paralyze you. Just walk into a bookstore, look at the Steinbeck section, and pick the one whose opening paragraph grabs you. For me, that was 'East of Eden': 'The Salinas Valley is in Northern California.' Simple, but it felt like the beginning of a myth. Trust your curiosity.
5 Answers2026-07-26 03:49:42
My two cents: The character's personal timeline is so rich that chronological order provides a powerful emotional through-line. You see his regrets, his failed relationships, and his constant battle with authority build from his youth. Publication order sometimes scatters those insights. If you're a character-driven reader, find that chronological list and commit. The payoff in understanding his cynicism and fragile code is immense.
3 Answers2026-07-26 22:59:44
The publication order is the story order for about 95% of the experience. Anyone telling you otherwise is creating optional homework. The character ages in real time, the technology advances, the political landscape of Scotland shifts. Reading 'Exit Music' after 'Knots and Crosses' is a journey of decades. Those flashback sequences in the later books are self-contained. They're meant to inform the present-day plot of that novel, not to be read as independent, stand-alone early adventures. Don't overthink it. Grab 'Knots and Crosses' and just plow through. You'll be fine.