Who Are The Key Thinkers Referenced In The Sacred And The Profane: The Nature Of Religion?

2026-03-24 01:36:37
207
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Start Test
Write Answer
Ask Question

3 Answers

Quincy
Quincy
Favorite read: The Forgotten God
Book Clue Finder Doctor
Eliade’s 'The Sacred and the Profane' is this brilliant mosaic of influences, and the way he references other thinkers feels like a conversation across time. Take Otto’s 'The Idea of the Holy'—Eliade borrows that spine-chilling sense of the 'wholly other' but expands it into how sacred spaces manifest physically, like temples or mountains. Then there’s Durkheim, lurking in the background; Eliade doesn’t outright cite him on every page, but you can feel the tension between Durkheim’s group-focused sacred and Eliade’s more individual, mystical leanings. Van der Leeuw’s work pops up too, especially in how Eliade dissects rituals—those moments when time seems to collapse into myth.

What’s cool is how Eliade doesn’t just regurgitate these ideas. He remixes them. Like, he takes Jung’s archetypes but strips away the psychoanalytic baggage, turning them into cross-cultural patterns instead. And though he’s critical of Freud, you can still spot traces of that obsession with origins—how sacred acts replay primordial events. It’s this layered, almost poetic synthesis that makes the book stick with you. I first read it during a college course on religion, and it blew my mind how Eliade could make ancient cosmologies feel urgent, like they were whispering secrets about modern alienation.
2026-03-25 11:31:37
2
Ian
Ian
Favorite read: A God In Chains
Careful Explainer Worker
One thing that struck me about 'The Sacred and the Profane' is how Eliade dances between thinkers without losing his own voice. Otto’s influence is obvious—that numinous terror and fascination is the heartbeat of Eliade’s sacred. But he also wrestles with Durkheim’s collective effervescence, arguing that the sacred isn’t just social glue; it’s a rupture in ordinary reality. Van der Leeuw’s meticulous cataloging of religious phenomena shapes Eliade’s method, but he’s less dry, more lyrical. And then there’s Jung, hovering in the margins with his archetypes—though Eliade avoids the rabbit hole of psychoanalysis. The book feels like a dinner party where these thinkers are all arguing, and Eliade’s the host synthesizing their best points. It’s not just theory; it’s a way of seeing the world, where a shaman’s trance or a Hindu temple isn’t exotic but a mirror to something primal in us.
2026-03-25 11:40:36
4
Uma
Uma
Favorite read: Sanctified Sin
Library Roamer Doctor
Reading 'The Sacred and the Profane' by Mircea Eliade was like stumbling into a treasure trove of philosophical and anthropological insights. Eliade himself draws heavily from thinkers like Rudolf Otto, especially Otto's concept of the 'numinous'—that eerie, awe-inspiring feeling at the heart of religious experience. Eliade also nods to Durkheim’s idea of the sacred as something socially constructed, though he pushes back a bit by emphasizing individual transcendence. Then there’s Gerardus van der Leeuw, whose phenomenology of religion clearly influenced Eliade’s approach to symbols and rituals. What’s fascinating is how Eliade weaves these ideas into his own framework, where sacred space and time aren’t just abstract concepts but lived realities. I’ve always loved how he contrasts 'profane' modernity with the sacred’s cyclical time—it makes ancient rituals feel almost rebellious against linear, clock-bound life.

Another layer comes from Eliade’s engagement with Jung, though he’s more cautious about Jung’s collective unconscious. You can see traces of Jung in how Eliade treats archetypes, like the Axis Mundi or the World Tree, as universal symbols. But Eliade grounds them in historical cultures rather than psychology. It’s wild how this book ties together so many threads—Otto’s mysticism, Durkheim’s sociology, van der Leeuw’s detail-oriented analysis—into something that feels both academic and weirdly personal. Every time I reread it, I notice new connections, like how Eliade’s 'eternal return' concept echoes Nietzsche but with a spiritual twist.
2026-03-30 19:08:25
14
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

Who are the key thinkers discussed in How Not to Be Secular?

3 Answers2026-03-08 22:31:49
Reading 'How Not to Be Secular' by James K.A. Smith was like stumbling into a philosophical debate where the heavyweights of modern thought were all shouting over each other—but in the best way possible. The book digs into Charles Taylor’s massive work 'A Secular Age,' but it doesn’t stop there. It’s like Smith handed me a map to navigate Taylor’s dense ideas, but along the way, he points out all these other thinkers who either clash with or complement Taylor. There’s Nietzsche, lurking in the background with his whole 'God is dead' thing, and Heidegger, who’s all about how we’re thrown into this world without a manual. Then there’s Marcel Gauchet, who argues that Christianity kinda dug its own grave by making secularism possible. Smith ties them together in this wild tapestry of how we got to this secular moment and why it feels so weird to live in it. What really stuck with me was how Smith uses these thinkers to show that secularism isn’t just about religion fading away—it’s this complicated dance where old spiritual cravings morph into new forms. Like, Taylor says we’re all 'buffered selves' now, cut off from enchantment, but Smith asks if that’s really true or if we’re just pretending. It’s heady stuff, but by the end, I felt like I’d been on this rollercoaster through modernity’s crisis of meaning. Also, props to Smith for making postmodern philosophy feel less like homework and more like a detective story.

What is the main argument in The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion?

3 Answers2026-03-24 05:09:46
Mircea Eliade’s 'The Sacred and the Profane' is this fascinating dive into how humans experience the sacred versus the everyday. He argues that religious people don’t just see time and space as uniform—they split it into sacred (cosmic, meaningful) and profane (ordinary, chaotic). For example, temples or rituals aren’t just locations or actions; they’re portals to a higher reality. What’s wild is how he ties this to ancient myths, showing how repeating sacred acts connects people to primordial events—like how New Year’s rituals symbolically reenact creation. It’s not dry theory; it’s about the visceral need to touch the divine. Eliade also explores how modern life tries to erase the sacred, yet hints it lingers in nostalgia for 'paradise' or even in secular art. I love how he frames this—like, even atheists might feel awe in a forest or at a concert, chasing echoes of the sacred. His idea that desacralization leaves a void? Spot-on. Reading this made me notice sacred/profane splits everywhere, from my grandma’s rituals to how fans treat comic-con like a pilgrimage.

Is The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion worth reading?

3 Answers2026-03-24 08:57:36
The first thing that struck me about 'The Sacred and the Profane' was how it made me rethink everyday spaces. Eliade’s exploration of sacredness isn’t just about temples or rituals—it’s about how humans carve meaning into the world. I’d walk past a park bench and suddenly wonder if someone, somewhere, might see it as a threshold between ordinary and transcendent. His contrast of cyclical sacred time versus linear profane time felt revolutionary, especially when applied to modern life. We’re so obsessed with productivity that we’ve lost those moments of ‘eternal return,’ where time collapses into something mythic. That said, some sections dragged for me. The anthropological examples are fascinating but dense, and I wished for more contemporary applications. Still, the core idea—that humans inherently seek to sacralize existence—stuck with me long after finishing. It’s not a breezy read, but if you’ve ever felt a weird nostalgia during golden-hour light or childhood holidays, this book gives language to that longing.

What books are similar to The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion?

3 Answers2026-03-24 04:23:08
Mircea Eliade's 'The Sacred and the Profane' is such a fascinating exploration of religious experience, isn't it? If you're looking for something with a similar vibe, I'd highly recommend Rudolf Otto's 'The Idea of the Holy'. It digs into that numinous feeling—the eerie, awe-inspiring side of religion that Eliade also touches on. Otto coined terms like 'mysterium tremendum' to describe the overwhelming presence of the divine, which feels like a natural companion piece. Another great pick is Jonathan Z. Smith’s 'Map Is Not Territory'. It critiques and expands on Eliade’s ideas, especially how we categorize sacred spaces and rituals. Smith’s writing is more analytical, but it’s just as thought-provoking. And if you want something with a broader cultural lens, Clifford Geertz’s 'The Interpretation of Cultures' is brilliant—it examines religion as a system of symbols, which feels like a cool parallel to Eliade’s structuralist approach. I love how these books make you rethink everyday spaces as potential thresholds to the sacred.

Does The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion explain the origins of religion?

3 Answers2026-03-24 14:48:39
Mircea Eliade's 'The Sacred and the Profane' isn't a straightforward origin story of religion, but it dives deep into how humans experience the sacred. The book argues that religious phenomena emerge from a fundamental distinction between the sacred and the profane—a dichotomy that shapes everything from rituals to myths. Eliade explores how ancient societies created 'cosmos' out of chaos by marking certain spaces and times as sacred, like temples or festivals. This isn't about pinpointing a historical 'first religion,' but rather showing how the sacred manifests universally across cultures. What fascinates me is his concept of 'hierophany'—moments where the sacred breaks into ordinary life. Think of burning bushes in the Bible or Buddha's enlightenment under the Bodhi tree. These aren't just stories; they reveal a pattern of how humans seek meaning. While Eliade doesn't trace religion to a single source, he paints a vivid picture of why it persists—as a way to connect with something transcendent. His work feels especially relevant today when people still crave sacredness, even in secular forms like fandom or nature worship.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status