How Does M Vim Compare To Neovim For Plugins?

2025-09-03 18:19:40
217
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Start Test
Write Answer
Ask Question

4 Answers

Oliver
Oliver
Ending Guesser Cashier
When I’m thinking like a plugin developer, the differences jump out clearly. Neovim gives a stable, documented Lua API and an RPC mechanism that makes remote plugins straightforward to write and test. That means I can offload work to external processes without blocking, use messagepack-rpc to communicate, and expose features to front-ends reliably. Developing plugins that are friendly to 'm vim' means dealing with different scripting languages (Vimscript, Python, Node), and being careful about which Vim features I rely on—some functions just aren’t available or behave differently. For compatibility I usually wrap Neovim-specific code paths so the plugin gracefully degrades on 'm vim'.

From a maintenance perspective, Neovim reduces complexity: fewer language bridges, less fiddly thread/async handling, and a stronger push toward Lua libraries. But if you want the largest potential user base without conditional code, target classic Vim features only—accepting you’ll miss some of Neovim’s niceties. Personally, I prototype in Neovim because iteration is faster, then consider compatibility shims if there’s demand for 'm vim'.
2025-09-04 08:17:48
2
Will
Will
Favorite read: WOLVIRE
Book Clue Finder Consultant
I've been using Vim since the era when plugin installation meant copying files into ~/.vim, so I have a soft spot for 'm vim' stability and its huge, battle-tested plugin catalog. That said, Neovim has this electric energy: its plugin API and built-in async capabilities make many modern plugins feel smoother. For everyday users, many plugins run just fine on both, but plugin authors increasingly target Neovim first because of Lua and remote plugin support. If I’m installing something heavy—tree-sitter integrations, fancy floating UI, or a modern LSP/completion stack—I reach for Neovim. For tiny tweaks, quick GUI sessions, or when I need compatibility with older systems, I fall back to 'm vim'. Both ecosystems overlap a lot, but the momentum right now is definitely with Neovim, which matters if you like trying new plugins every week.
2025-09-05 21:37:01
2
Ella
Ella
Favorite read: Vampire Oblivion
Honest Reviewer Driver
Short, practical take from someone who toggles between projects: Neovim offers newer plugin capabilities—async, Lua, floating windows, and a friendly RPC model—so plugins can be richer and less laggy. 'm vim' (or classic Vim/MacVim builds) still runs most plugins and has a deeper legacy base, but some modern plugins are Neovim-only or expect extra compile flags. If you value bleeding-edge features like native LSP integrations, nvim-centric plugin managers, and fast startup for complex configs, pick Neovim. If you want GUI convenience or strict compatibility with older workflows, stick with 'm vim' for now. Personally, I switched to Neovim for the smoother LSP and Lua ecosystem, but I keep a vanilla Vim profile for quick GUI editing.
2025-09-07 10:05:20
20
Henry
Henry
Story Finder UX Designer
Okay, here’s the short version first, but then I’ll expand — I love geeking out about editor choices. For plugins, Neovim is the one that pushed the ecosystem forward: it brought a clean RPC-based plugin model, first-class async job handling, and a modern Lua API that plugin authors love. That means a lot of recent plugins are written in Lua or expect Neovim-only features like virtual text, floating windows, and extmarks. The result is snappier, more feature-rich plugins that can do things without blocking the UI.

If you use 'm vim' (think classic Vim or MacVim builds), you still get a massive, mature plugin ecosystem. Many plugin authors keep compatibility with Vim, and core functionality works fine — but some newer plugins either require extra patches, rely on Vim being compiled with specific features (job control, Python/Ruby/Node support), or are Neovim-only because they use the Lua or RPC APIs. Practically, that means your favorite long-lived plugins like statuslines, file explorers, and linters usually work on either, but cutting-edge integrations (native LSP clients, modern completion engines written in Lua) will feel more at home in Neovim.

My take: if you want modern plugins, async performance, and future-facing features, Neovim wins. If you prefer a familiar Vim experience, GUI comforts on macOS, or rely on plugins that haven’t migrated, 'm vim' still serves well. I ended up switching because I wanted Lua-based configs and non-blocking LSP, but I still keep a light Vim profile around for quick GUI sessions.
2025-09-09 22:20:25
7
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

What plugins improve m in vim mark management?

1 Answers2025-09-03 11:32:39
If you’re trying to wrangle marks in Vim and keep losing your mental map of where you left stuff, you’re not alone — marks are insanely useful but a little clumsy out of the box. I used to set a bunch of lowercase and uppercase marks, then spend five minutes hunting for the one I actually needed. Over the years I picked up a handful of plugins and tiny tricks that make mark management smooth: visualizing marks in the gutter, persisting bookmarks between sessions, and giving quick keybindings to jump or list marks. The suggestions below are what I reach for when a project gets messy and I want my navigation to feel deliberate again. First up, plugins that make marks obvious and manageable: 'vim-signature' (shows marks in the sign column and offers lightweight mappings for toggling/removing marks), a bookmarks plugin (many are called 'vim-bookmarks' or simply 'bookmarks' on GitHub) which gives a persistent set of bookmarks you can toggle and list, and newer Neovim-focused tools like 'marks.nvim' that offer richer APIs in Lua (persistence, visual indicators, and nicer listing commands). If you do more file-level navigation than line-level, 'harpoon' (by ThePrimeagen) is fantastic for pinning frequently edited files and jumping to them instantly—it’s more file-bookmark than line-mark, but it complements marks nicely. There are also older helpers simply named 'vim-marks' or 'marks' that give :Marks-style listings and quick operations; search GitHub for any of those names and you’ll find several maintained forks and variants. Practical tips that helped me the most: get a plugin that visually marks lines in the sign column (so your eyeballs stop playing hide-and-seek), and pair that with an easy list command (many plugins offer :Marks or :Bookmarks which opens a quickfix or location list). For session persistence, either use a plugin that explicitly saves marks/bookmarks or rely on Vim’s session/mksession features to store your location info when you close a project. I also map a couple of ergonomic keys: one to toggle a bookmark on the current line, one to jump to the next/previous bookmark, and one to open the bookmark list in a quickfix window. Small mappings like that turn marks from an afterthought into a core part of my workflow. Honestly, once I split responsibilities (line marks + visual signs via a signature-style plugin, file marks via 'harpoon' or a bookmarks plugin, and session persistence via the plugin or mksession), my navigation felt way more intentional. If you want, tell me whether you’re using plain Vim or Neovim and which plugin manager you use (vim-plug/packer/ Dein/etc.), and I can sketch exact install lines and a tiny config snippet that matches your setup. I love tinkering with these little UX improvements—they’re the tiny tweaks that make long editing sessions much less painful.

How do you install plugins in m vim on macOS?

4 Answers2025-09-03 18:14:39
If you're running MacVim (the mvim command) on macOS, the simplest, most reliable route for me has been vim-plug. It just feels clean: drop a tiny bootstrap file into ~/.vim/autoload, add a few lines to ~/.vimrc, then let the plugin manager handle the rest. For vim-plug I run: curl -fLo ~/.vim/autoload/plug.vim --create-dirs https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junegunn/vim-plug/master/plug.vim. After that I edit ~/.vimrc and add: call plug#begin('~/.vim/plugged') Plug 'tpope/vim-sensible' Plug 'junegunn/fzf', { 'do': { -> fzf#install() } } call plug#end() Then I launch MacVim with mvim and run :PlugInstall (or from the shell mvim +PlugInstall +qall) and watch the plugins clone and install. A few handy things: if a plugin needs build steps, check its README; some require ctags, ripgrep, or Python support. Also remember MacVim reads your ~/.vimrc (and you can put GUI tweaks in ~/.gvimrc). If you prefer built-in package management, the pack/start method works too: mkdir -p ~/.vim/pack/vendor/start && git clone ~/.vim/pack/vendor/start/, then restart mvim.

Does m vim support Lua configuration for speed?

4 Answers2025-09-03 11:19:50
Totally doable — and honestly, if you care about startup speed and responsiveness, moving Lua into your editor config is one of the cleanest moves I’ve made. I switched much of my setup to a Lua-first workflow (using Neovim) and noticed two big wins: faster plugin startup because plugin managers written in Lua can lazy-load better, and less overhead in your config because Lua is just faster than complex Vimscript. If you’re asking about "m vim" specifically (like MacVim or an ordinary Vim build called mvim), it comes down to how that binary was compiled. Vim can support Lua or LuaJIT if it was built with +lua or +luajit; Neovim, on the other hand, has first-class Lua from 0.5 onward and feels designed around it. Practical tip: check vim --version for +lua or +luajit, or just try :lua print('hi') inside the editor. If you want the smoothest, fastest Lua experience, I recommend trying Neovim and using an init.lua plus a Lua plugin manager like packer.nvim or lazy.nvim. Also profile startup with --startuptime and trim autocommands — that’s where speed really shows. It made editing feel snappier for me, especially when juggling many plugins.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status