Who Are The Main Critics Referenced In 'Looking At Movies: An Introduction To Film'?

2026-03-27 00:58:14
262
分享
ABO人格測試
快速測測看!你的真實屬性是 Alpha、Beta 還是 Omega?
馬上測測看
回答
提問

3 答案

Jack
Jack
最喜歡的讀物: What the Screen Never Knew
Ending Guesser Receptionist
Reading 'Looking at Movies' felt like getting a crash course from the greatest film minds. David Bordwell’s structural approach pops up a lot—his breakdowns of narrative patterns helped me spot why some movies feel 'off' when they skip classic three-act setups. And Roger Ebert’s accessible yet deep reviews are quoted like gospel; his love for 'Casablanca' made me rewatch it with fresh eyes. The book also highlights Manny Farber’s term 'termite art' for films that chew away at conventions, which stuck with me after binging indie flicks.

It’s not all old-school, though. Contemporary voices like B. Ruby Rich get space too, especially her takes on queer cinema. The mix of eras makes the book feel alive, like a conversation spanning decades. I now scribble notes in margins like, 'Would Kael hate this?' during slow burns.
2026-03-28 07:50:53
13
Evelyn
Evelyn
最喜歡的讀物: The Final Cut
Bookworm UX Designer
'Looking at Movies' introduced me to critics who changed how I watch films. There’s Robin Wood, whose Freudian take on Hitchcock’s 'Vertigo' made the staircase scene even creepier. And Dudley Andrew’s comparisons of adaptations—like how 'The Godfather' translates Puzo’s book—taught me to appreciate choices directors make. The book balances these heavyweights with playful critics like Jonathan Rosenbaum, who argues for valuing B-movies as art. After reading, I started seeking out their original essays—it’s like the book handed me a treasure map.
2026-03-28 11:11:46
5
Georgia
Georgia
最喜歡的讀物: Though a Mirror Darkly
Careful Explainer Lawyer
One of the coolest things about 'Looking at Movies' is how it weaves in insights from legendary critics like André Bazin and Sergei Eisenstein. Bazin’s ideas about realism in cinema totally reshape how you notice details in shots—like how long takes can make a scene feel more immersive. Eisenstein’s theories on montage? Mind-blowing! The way he breaks down how editing can create meaning is something I still geek out about. The book also nods to Pauline Kael’s sharp, opinionated reviews, which remind me that film criticism isn’t just analysis—it’s passion with a backbone.

Then there’s Laura Mulvey’s feminist lens, which flipped my perspective on how women are framed in classic Hollywood. Her 'male gaze' concept is everywhere once you start looking for it. The book doesn’t just name-drop; it connects their theories to scenes we’ve all seen, like 'Psycho' or 'Citizen Kane,' making it feel less like homework and more like a behind-the-scenes commentary track. I’ve caught myself ranting to friends about these critics at movie nights—they’re that influential.
2026-03-31 01:27:55
8
查看全部答案
掃碼下載 APP

相關作品

相關問題

Who are the key figures discussed in The Classical Hollywood Cinema?

4 答案2025-12-12 03:08:41
The Classical Hollywood Cinema is such a fascinating deep dive into film history! The book highlights directors like Alfred Hitchcock, who practically invented suspense with films like 'Psycho' and 'Vertigo.' Then there's John Ford, the master behind epic Westerns like 'The Searchers'—his framing of landscapes still gives me chills. It also discusses producers like David O. Selznick, whose meticulous control shaped 'Gone with the Wind' into a cultural landmark. And let’s not forget stars like Humphrey Bogart, whose gruff charm defined noir in 'Casablanca.' The book really makes you appreciate how these figures built the language of cinema we still use today.

Who are the key theorists discussed in Film Form: Essays In Film Theory?

5 答案2026-01-21 21:00:23
Film Form: Essays In Film Theory' is a dense but fascinating collection by Sergei Eisenstein, and it dives deep into the minds of several groundbreaking thinkers. Eisenstein himself is a central figure, dissecting his own theories of montage—how editing can create emotional and intellectual impact beyond the sum of individual shots. But he also engages with other giants like Vsevolod Pudovkin, who had a more linear approach to montage, and Dziga Vertov, the wild experimentalist behind 'Man with a Movie Camera,' obsessed with 'kino-eye' and capturing raw reality. Eisenstein doesn’t just stick to fellow Soviets, though. He wrestles with broader aesthetic ideas, nodding to theorists like Rudolf Arnheim, who wrote about film as a unique visual art form, and even debates early Hollywood storytelling structures. What’s cool is how Eisenstein’s essays feel like a conversation—sometimes heated—with these other voices, all pushing film theory forward in the early 20th century. It’s less about dry academic citations and more about fiery creative clashes.

What are books like 'Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film'?

3 答案2026-03-27 01:08:35
If you enjoyed 'Looking at Movies: An Introduction to Film', you might find 'Film Art: An Introduction' by David Bordwell and Kristin Thompson equally fascinating. It’s another great textbook that breaks down the mechanics of filmmaking, from mise-en-scène to editing, but with a slightly more academic tone. I love how it pairs theory with concrete examples, making it accessible even if you’re not a film student. Another gem is 'The Story of Film' by Mark Cousins—less of a textbook and more of a passionate, globe-trotting love letter to cinema. It’s packed with insights and feels like a conversation with a friend who’s seen every movie ever made. The way Cousins connects films across decades and cultures is mind-blowing, and it’s made me appreciate lesser-known works I’d never have discovered otherwise.
探索並免費閱讀 優質小說
GoodNovel APP 免費暢讀海量優秀小說,下載喜歡的書籍,隨時隨地閱讀。
在 APP 免費閱讀書籍
掃碼在 APP 閱讀
DMCA.com Protection Status