Which Spells Would Smeagol Harry Potter Cast In Duels?

2025-10-06 05:57:12
223
แชร์
แบบทดสอบบุคลิกภาพ ABO
ทำแบบทดสอบอย่างรวดเร็วเพื่อค้นหาว่าคุณเป็น Alpha, Beta หรือ Omega
เริ่มการทดสอบ
คำตอบ
คำถาม

4 คำตอบ

Violet
Violet
หนังสือเล่มโปรด: The Rogue Warlock's Twin Flame
Novel Fan Firefighter
I get a mischievous, speed-runner vibe imagining Smeagol dueling. He'd be all about hit-and-run combos, tiny instantaneous spells that create openings, then vanish. Think quick 'Muffliato' to muffle, immediately follow with 'Impedimenta' to slow, then 'Expelliarmus' while you stagger. If that fails: 'Stupefy' into a short 'Petrificus Totalus' to bind, then grab-and-flee with 'Apparate' or a pocket 'Alohomora' trick to slip away with the loot.

Tactically, he'd favor nonverbal and wandless magic when he's terrified or furious — emotions fuel his power, so a surprise scream could make a dangerous, raw spell erupt. For riskier finishes he'd use 'Sectumsempra' or 'Reducto', but those are double-edged; they show that Gollum's side isn't far from actual homicidal curses like 'Crucio' (which he'd probably only use if cornered and in full monstrous mode). I also imagine clever use of the terrain: collapsing rafters with 'Relashio' or 'Bombarda' aimed low, tripping someone into a pit using 'Levioso' or 'Impedimenta'. In short: messy, quick, emotionally-driven magic that favors escape and possession over nobility or honor.
2025-10-08 19:01:56
13
Gavin
Gavin
หนังสือเล่มโปรด: A Kissing Spell
Reviewer Photographer
When I picture Smeagol in a duel, I see a split-personality approach to magic: one side cowering and clever, the other brutal and primal. So I imagine him favoring a lot of misdirection and small-utility spells at first — 'Alohomora' to pry at pockets, 'Muffliato' to keep eavesdroppers away, 'Impedimenta' to trip pursuers. He'd use 'Confundus' to scramble an opponent's senses, and 'Petrificus Totalus' to immobilize someone long enough to snatch their wand or object.

But when the dark whisper wins out, he'd become reckless and vicious, throwing out 'Sectumsempra' or 'Reducto' in short, savage bursts. He wouldn't cast long, ornate sequences; his style would be impulsive, half-whispered, sometimes wandless when emotions run high. Also, given his obsessional nature, charms tied to possession or concealment — hexes that hide or bind objects — would be his bread and butter. It's more psychology than pure technique: catch him calm and he'll confuse you; catch him rabid and he'll try to rip you apart with the nastiest spells he can mutter.
2025-10-09 10:13:49
9
Mason
Mason
หนังสือเล่มโปรด: Reborn Dragon Vein Warlock, talented beautiful mage
Book Scout Lawyer
Picture this as a short tactical cheat-sheet: Smeagol's spells would be small, nasty, and opportunistic. He'd start with 'Muffliato' or 'Silencio' to stop you shouting, then 'Confundus' to scramble your thoughts. If you get close, expect 'Expelliarmus' to take your wand and 'Petrificus Totalus' to freeze you in place. For dirty violence he'd revert to 'Sectumsempra' or 'Reducto' when he snaps.

He's not graceful: think panicked, whispery casting, sometimes wandless. He'd also favor concealment charms and pocket theft tricks like 'Alohomora' and small binding hexes to keep the Precious. If you're dueling someone who mutters about "my Precious," don't trust a single lull; he's likely setting a trap rather than offering mercy.
2025-10-09 18:39:59
4
Yvonne
Yvonne
หนังสือเล่มโปรด: Gunpowder, Magic, and Lead
Careful Explainer Veterinarian
If Smeagol from 'The Lord of the Rings' got dropped into the world of 'Harry Potter', I think he'd favor sneaky, spiteful little spells that let him skitter in the shadows and steal whatever he wants. He wouldn't be elegant or proud about dueling — he'd be furtive and vicious, the kind of opponent who lunges when you least expect it.

He'd use 'Muffliato' or 'Silencio' to keep witnesses quiet, and 'Confundus' to make an opponent forget which way is forward. For direct confrontation he'd probably spam 'Expelliarmus' to take a wand and then 'Petrificus Totalus' or 'Stupefy' to freeze or stun. When the darker side takes over — poor Gollum — he'd reach for nastier things like 'Sectumsempra' or 'Reducto' to maim and break, because his hands tear and tear. He'd also be alarmingly good at using environment-based spells: 'Lumos' flicked low to blind you, 'Obscuro' to toss a blindfold, then slither in for the kill.

Mostly though, his magic would be about chaos and grabbing the Precious — tricky charms, sudden curses, and clever traps. I'd watch my back if he hissed something about "my Precious," because that's when he gets really dangerous.
2025-10-10 12:03:48
18
ดูคำตอบทั้งหมด
สแกนรหัสเพื่อดาวน์โหลดแอป

หนังสือที่เกี่ยวข้อง

คำถามที่เกี่ยวข้อง

Could smeagol harry potter survive Hogwarts duels?

4 คำตอบ2025-08-23 22:04:52
Oh, what a hilarious mental image—Smeagol in a Hogwarts dueling ring! I can see him now, hissing and twitching while everyone waves wands. Realistically, if we're talking about formal, wand-to-wand duels the way students practice in the dueling club, Smeagol's survival chances depend almost entirely on context. He isn't a witch or wizard, so he can't cast spells reliably; that alone puts him at a huge disadvantage against anyone who knows basic charms like 'Stupefy' or 'Expelliarmus'. On the other hand, his strengths are the kind no textbook covers: slipperiness, feral cunning, and a knack for hiding. Those let him avoid getting hit rather than trade blows. If he turned up with the Ring from 'The Lord of the Rings', all bets shift—suddenly he's invisible, able to skulk around and ambush or flee. Against first-years or distracted duelists he could slip past and survive, maybe even snatch a wand if someone dropped one. But against trained duelists, Professors, or Aurors? No. A well-aimed Stunning Spell or a simple protective charm would incapacitate him. So I’d say: survivable in chaos and stealthy scenarios, laughably outclassed in a straight-up duel with magic users who know what they're doing. I'd personally love to sketch that scene—Smeagol under an invisibility cloak, hissing at a confused Hufflepuff, and vanishing into the portrait hole.

How would smeagol harry potter use the One Ring at Hogwarts?

4 คำตอบ2025-08-23 11:35:15
I’ve always loved imagining mash-ups that shouldn’t work on paper but feel absolutely right in the headcanon lab, and picturing Smeagol skulking through the corridors of Hogwarts with the One Ring is delightfully chaotic. First off, invisibility is the obvious win: slipping past Filch, peeking into dormitories, and eavesdropping on late-night common room gossip would be his daily bread. But the Ring doesn’t just hide—you can feel it bending wills. At Hogwarts that would mean more than just being unseen; Smeagol could whisper and tug at weaker minds, coax house-elves into secret errands, or nudge a naive first-year into sharing treats from the kitchens. There’s also the clash of mythologies that fascinates me. In 'The Lord of the Rings' the Ring draws attention from Sauron; at Hogwarts it would probably radiate like a beacon to curious dark artifacts and the Ministry’s aurors. Imagine portraits whispering rumors of a glinting presence, Dumbledore following threads of strange enchantment, or even Voldemort sniffing out another source of domination. I love to think about small, human moments too: Smeagol hunched in a broom cupboard, murmuring to the Ring about sandwiches, half afraid to leave because of how comfortable its possessiveness feels. It’s messy, a little tragic, and totally compelling—like a crossover fanfic I’d reread for the creepy charm of it all.
สำรวจและอ่านนวนิยายดีๆ ได้ฟรี
เข้าถึงนวนิยายดีๆ จำนวนมากได้ฟรีบนแอป GoodNovel ดาวน์โหลดหนังสือที่คุณชอบและอ่านได้ทุกที่ทุกเวลา
อ่านหนังสือฟรีบนแอป
สแกนรหัสเพื่ออ่านบนแอป
DMCA.com Protection Status