Locke's 'Who is Government' hits different when you realize it's basically a 17th-century manifesto. The guy wasn't just theorizing—he was throwing shade at kings while they could still have him executed. What fascinates me is how practical his 'why' was. After seeing the bloodshed caused by unchecked power, he designed government like a user manual: 'If rulers break the contract, people can reboot the system.' His concept of property rights sparked capitalism, but also warned against wealth hoarding. The book stays relevant because it frames power as a tool, not a privilege. If this grabs you, Montesquieu's 'Spirit of Laws' tackles how to structure that power wisely.
I recently stumbled upon 'Who is Government' and was curious about its origins. The book was written by political theorist John Locke back in 1689 as part of his 'Two Treatises of Government'. Locke was fed up with absolute monarchy and wanted to lay down ideas about natural rights and social contracts. He argued governments exist to protect life, liberty, and property—not to boss people around. The timing wasn't random; England was shaking off the Glorious Revolution, and Locke's work became the blueprint for modern democracy. If you like this, check out Thomas Hobbes' 'Leviathan' for a contrasting take on authority.
Digging into political philosophy, I found 'Who is Government' is actually a section from Locke's larger work. The man was a revolutionary thinker—literally. He wrote it while exiled in Holland, hiding from England's king who wanted his head for challenging divine right rule. Locke's core idea? Governments aren't natural; they're human inventions that need constant consent from the governed. His words later fueled the American Revolution—you can spot his influence in the Declaration of Independence.
The book's genius lies in its simplicity. Unlike dense theorists, Locke wrote plainly about power limits. He imagined society pre-government (the 'state of nature'), then showed why rational people would create rules—but only fair ones. The 'why' is personal too: Locke's father fought in England's civil wars, making him obsessed with preventing tyranny. For deeper dives, Rousseau's 'The Social Contract' expands these ideas with more emotional punch.
2025-07-05 21:54:04
20
View All Answers
Scan code to download App
Related Books
Before the Council Named Me Donna
Gemma
0
4.0K
For one year, I believed Matteo De Luca had truly fallen in love with me.
Our marriage began as an alliance, but he held me every night, kissed me before council meetings, and fastened the De Luca Donna brooch at my throat as if I already belonged beside him.
Then his first love, Vanessa Ashford, came back.
Within days, our official ceremony was postponed, her access was added to the Donna wing, and Matteo stopped wearing the family signet he once used to claim me in public.
He said it was council business.
But council business did not leave amber perfume on his skin. It did not sit beside him on a private jet to Palm Beach. And it certainly did not smile from the Donna’s chair while his friends watched me lose my place.
The final humiliation came at a private dinner, when someone asked whether I was Matteo’s wife.
He looked at me, then said calmly, “Elena and I have an arrangement.”
That night, I stopped waiting to be chosen.
Matteo could keep his first love, his title, and the home he let her enter.
I packed my passport, my Florence contract, and the prenatal report he had never seen.
Then I left New York with his child.
I grew up abroad. My mother feared I might marry a foreign man, so she arranged an engagement for me with a talented and handsome man in Flodon. She insisted that I return home to get engaged.
I came back and started shopping for an engagement dress at a luxury boutique. I selected an off-white strapless gown and decided to try it on.
Suddenly, a woman nearby glanced at the dress in my hand and told the saleswoman, “That’s a unique design. Let me try it.”
The saleswoman immediately yanked it out of my hands.
I protested indignantly, “Excuse me, I was here first. Don’t you understand the principle of ‘first come, first served’? Or do you just not care about common decency?”
The woman scoffed and retorted, “This dress costs $188,000. Do you really think a broke nobody like you can even afford it?
“I’m Lucas Goodwin’s sister in all but blood. He’s the chairman of Goodwin’s Group. In Flodon, the Goodwin family sets the rules.”
What a coincidence! Lucas Goodwin was my fiance!
I immediately called him and said, “Hey, your ‘sister in all but blood’ just stole my engagement dress. Do something about it.”
The President. The Vice President. The Senator. The Congresswoman. The Mayor.
Behind every power comes with great secrets no one knows about.
Five women who will show how dirty and utterly pleasurable politics can be; because no matter how you will look at it...
Politics will always be a dirty game.
The novel is mainly about the forgotten British poet/writer named C. J Richards who lived in Burma/Myanmar in colonial times and he believed himself as a Burmophile. He served as I.C.S (Indian Civil Servant) and when he retired from I.C.S service, he was a D.C (District Commissioner) and he left for England a year before Burma gained its independence in 1948. He came to Burma in 1920 to work in civil service after passing the hardest I.C.S examination. He wrote several books on Burma and contributed many monthly articles to Guardian Magazine published in Burma from 1953 to 1974 or 1975. Though he wrote several books which had much literary merit to both communities, Britain and Burma (Myanmar), people failed to recognize him.
The story has two parts: one part is set in the contemporary Yangon (then called Rangoon) in 2016 context and a young literary enthusiast named “Lin” found out unexpectedly the forgotten writer’s poetry book and there is surely a good deal of time gap that led him into a quest to know more about the author’s life. The setting is quite different comparing to colonial Burma and independence Myanmar (Burma), early twentieth century and 2016 which is a transitional period in Myanmar.
The writer’s life is fictionalized in the novel and most of the facts are taken from his personal stories and other reference books. It is a kind of historical novel with a twist and it has comparatively constructed the two different periods in Myanmar history to convince readers, locally and abroad more about history, authorship, humanity, colonialism, and transitional development in Myanmar today.
Behind the Desk, Under the Mask
For three years, Winston has been Louis's secretary—the only employee capable of keeping up with the demanding CEO of one of the country's most powerful companies. Their days are filled with arguments, impossible deadlines, and constant clashes that leave everyone wondering how Winston still has a job.
What Louis doesn't know is that Winston was never hired by chance.
As the son of Vance, Louis's biggest business rival, Winston was planted inside the company to gather information and help bring it down from within. What began as a mission soon becomes complicated as the years pass, and the line between duty and loyalty starts to blur.
Then a shocking discovery changes everything.
A secret connection reveals a side of Louis that no one else has ever seen, forcing Winston to confront the truth he has spent years avoiding. The man he was sent to betray is no longer just his boss—he has become someone Winston can no longer bring himself to hurt.
As hidden agendas come to light and a ruthless corporate war intensifies, Winston finds himself trapped between two worlds: the father who raised him and the man he was sent to destroy.
In a game of secrets, loyalty, and betrayal, every mask will eventually fall—and when the truth is exposed, neither of them may walk away unscathed.
A love affair between two unlikely fellows because of the huge differences in their religion, culture and tribe. The two strange fellows met in a national youth service scheme after graduating from the university.
It was love at first sight. But from a distance the love brewed till their paths crossed. Everything nearly fall apart if not that they were meant be. Destiny has a way of orchestrating events. They had no option than to tell themselves the truth which is that happiness lies with both of them coming together as one.
But to make this happen the two had to wrestle down the tribal hatred, the religious acrimony, the cultural bias that nearly shattered their love. It's romantic, it's intriguing, it's fascinating, it's titillating and captivating.
The protagonist in 'Who is Government' is Victor Creed, a former special forces operative turned revolutionary. Victor's journey starts when he uncovers a massive government conspiracy that frames him for treason. He's not your typical hero—he's ruthlessly pragmatic, using his military training to dismantle the system from within. His combat skills are unmatched, blending guerrilla tactics with high-tech hacking to expose corruption. What makes him compelling is his moral ambiguity. He doesn't fight for ideals but for survival, yet his actions inadvertently spark a nationwide uprising. The story explores how one man's vendetta evolves into a movement, challenging the very definition of justice.
I can say it's a brutal takedown of political theater. The book exposes how modern governments operate more like corporations than public servants, prioritizing profit over people. Politicians are portrayed as brand managers selling carefully crafted images rather than leaders solving real issues. The most damning critique shows how systems designed to represent citizens actually create barriers between power and the populace. Voting becomes performative, policies turn into PR campaigns, and accountability vanishes behind layers of bureaucracy. What stuck with me is how the author compares campaign promises to expired coupons - flashy but ultimately worthless. The chilling part? This isn't presented as some dystopian fiction, but as documented reality with receipts.
'Who is Government' definitely draws from real-world chaos. The series mirrors how power struggles play out in actual governments, especially those coalition nightmares where no party has full control. The main plotline about a minority government barely holding onto power feels ripped from recent European politics. Several character arcs seem inspired by famous political figures - there's a chancellor who reminds me of Merkel's pragmatic style mixed with Macron's youthful energy. The show's portrayal of backroom deals and media manipulation is scarily accurate to how modern democracies operate. While names and countries are fictionalized, the underlying tensions between idealism and realpolitik are textbook political science.