Who Advocates For Rejecting The Two In The Fellowship?

2026-05-29 22:29:33
136
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Start Test
Write Answer
Ask Question

4 Answers

Spoiler Watcher Accountant
Boromir is the one who openly advocates for rejecting the two hobbits, Merry and Pippin, during the Council of Elrond in 'The Fellowship of the Ring.' His argument stems from practicality—he views them as inexperienced and a potential liability on the perilous journey to Mordor. He’s not wrong, honestly; their clumsiness and lack of combat skills do seem like risks. But what’s fascinating is how his perspective contrasts with Aragorn and Gandalf’s. They see the hobbits’ loyalty and heart as invaluable, even if their strengths aren’t obvious. Boromir’s stance reflects his militaristic mindset, prioritizing efficiency over camaraderie. It’s a moment that foreshadows his later struggles with the Ring’s influence, too—his focus on power and results blinds him to the softer, subtler strengths of fellowship.

In hindsight, though, Merry and Pippin prove everyone wrong. They might stumble into trouble, but their courage and cleverness save the day more than once. Boromir’s dismissal of them feels almost tragic later, especially when he redeems himself protecting them. It’s a reminder that Tolkien’s world values unexpected heroes—something Boromir, for all his nobility, forgets in that moment.
2026-05-30 15:37:35
3
Piper
Piper
Reviewer Veterinarian
It’s Boromir who argues against bringing Merry and Pippin along, and his reasoning feels very human. He’s a soldier, trained to assess risk, and two untested hobbits seem like unnecessary variables. But Tolkien’s genius is in how he subverts that. The Fellowship isn’t just a tactical mission—it’s about trust and diversity. Boromir’s doubt mirrors how we often underestimate people who don’t fit traditional ‘strength’ molds. Later, when he sacrifices himself for them, it’s like the story’s way of saying even the most pragmatic hearts can learn to value the unlikeliest allies.
2026-06-02 08:49:37
5
Xenia
Xenia
Favorite read: Not One, But Two Mates
Book Scout Teacher
Boromir’s the one who questions including Merry and Pippin, and it’s such a loaded moment. His practicality clashes with the story’s theme that even the small can change the world. His arc—from skepticism to sacrificing for them—shows how his understanding of strength evolves. Funny how the ‘weakest’ end up shaping Middle-earth’s fate more than anyone expected.
2026-06-02 13:29:09
10
Bookworm Driver
Man, Boromir’s push to leave Merry and Pippin behind always gets me heated! He’s all about ‘the strong must lead,’ dismissing the hobbits as dead weight. But that’s so shortsighted. Sure, they’re not warriors, but their humor and sheer stubbornness keep the group grounded. Without them, the Fellowship would’ve fractured way earlier from sheer tension. Plus, Pippin’s curiosity literally changes the course of history—hello, Palantír moment? Boromir’s logic isn’t entirely unfair, but it misses the bigger picture: sometimes the ‘weakest’ members are the glue.
2026-06-04 18:01:00
3
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

What does rejecting the two mean in The Two Towers?

4 Answers2026-05-29 23:37:31
Rejecting the two in 'The Two Towers' is such a fascinating concept, and it really ties into the deeper themes of choice and temptation in Middle-earth. For me, it symbolizes the resistance against the dual corrupting forces represented by the towers—Orthanc and Barad-dûr. Saruman and Sauron both embody different flavors of domination, one through twisted wisdom and the other through raw power. The Fellowship's journey is all about refusing to succumb to either, choosing instead the harder path of integrity. What gets me every time is how this mirrors real-life struggles. We’re often faced with 'two towers' of our own—maybe it’s greed versus apathy, or ambition versus complacency. Tolkien’s genius was in showing that rejecting both extremes doesn’t mean passivity; it’s an active commitment to something greater. Frodo’s resilience against the Ring’s pull, Aragorn’s refusal to seize power prematurely—they’re all part of this tapestry. The towers aren’t just physical; they’re ideological prisons.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status