Why Do Some Directors Cite The Medium Is Not The Message?

2025-08-27 04:53:45
145
Share
ABO Personality Quiz
Take a quick quiz to find out whether you‘re Alpha, Beta, or Omega.
Start Test
Write Answer
Ask Question

4 Answers

Wesley
Wesley
Favorite read: Fictitious Reality
Sharp Observer Assistant
I often take a contrarian view at screenings: the argument that 'the medium is not the message' is really a protest against technological or market determinism. Directors know their craft involves choices — framing, pacing, performance, sound design — and they can’t be reduced to the platform their work appears on. When a show moves from cinema to streaming, or a novel becomes a film, what changes are constraints and affordances: runtime limits, budget, censorship, audience expectation. But those are tools, not the theme itself.

Historically, filmmakers have reclaimed authorship through style — the so-called auteurism — precisely to show message stems from intention, not purely medium. I see this in adaptations: 'Memento' uses structure to echo memory, but the core idea remains an exploration of identity, not a manifesto about filmic devices. Directors push back because a wholesale devotion to medium-first thinking removes responsibility for what they actually want to say.
2025-08-29 00:31:54
4
Oliver
Oliver
Spoiler Watcher HR Specialist
I get excited talking about how platforms nudge creators, so when I hear someone claim the medium isn't the message I think of the attention economy. Lately I've noticed short-form apps and algorithm-driven platforms changing how stories get told — 60-second beats, punchy hooks — and many directors push back because they don't want themes squashed into platform-friendly templates. That doesn't mean the medium has no influence; it absolutely does. The camera can lie with angles, editing can reorder truth, and a live theatre's immediacy changes how an audience feels tension.

But from my perspective, saying the medium isn't the message is a defensive, creative stance: it's asserting that ideas, ethics, and character arcs refuse to be fully determined by format. Look at adaptations like 'The Last of Us' — it benefits from television's scope, but the themes of love and survival were already present in the game. Conversely, seeing a play or novel adapted into a film can reveal hidden layers or blunt some edges; that interplay is fascinating. In short, medium matters, but directors remind us meaning emerges from choices, context, and how audiences bring their own baggage to the work.
2025-08-30 09:45:12
9
Reid
Reid
Favorite read: Don't Take Me Lightly
Ending Guesser Teacher
Sometimes I get into these late-night arguments with friends over whether form dictates meaning, and that's where the phrase 'the medium is not the message' pops up for me. I like to flip McLuhan on its head: sure, the medium shapes possibilities — a close-up in film is a different kind of intimacy than a stage monologue — but directors who say the medium isn't the message are defending the idea that intention, performance, and context carry the real weight.

I had one of those tiny epiphanies watching 'Blade Runner' after reading 'Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?' The cinematic noir mood, the soundtrack, and the rain-drenched visuals gave the film a life separate from the book's themes. The medium added flavor, but the message about memory and humanity lived in the choices: which scenes were kept, which emotions were emphasized. Directors who push back against medium-determinism want to remind us the story, the actors, and the political or personal lens matter more than saying the medium alone defines the meaning. It’s like arguing a guitar makes the song — it helps, but the melody still comes from the person playing it.
2025-08-30 13:13:52
13
Quentin
Quentin
Favorite read: Going Off-Script
Sharp Observer Driver
I like to think of media as different instruments in an orchestra. When a director says 'the medium is not the message', I hear them saying the instrument shouldn't steal the melody. The camera, stage, or console gives unique colors and dynamics, but they’re still serving the story and the intentions behind it.

Practical stuff matters too: studio notes, runtime, and distribution often bend how a story is told, so directors push back to protect themes and tone. A movie can make a joke land differently than a comic, but the point — what you’re trying to say about people or society — can survive the shift if handled deliberately. I usually side with creators who treat medium as a collaborator, not the boss.
2025-08-30 20:13:02
7
View All Answers
Scan code to download App

Related Books

Related Questions

How does the medium is not the message influence film theory?

4 Answers2025-08-27 02:34:18
I get excited thinking about this because it flips a tidy slogan on its head and forces you to look at movies like living, breathing conversations. When people say the medium is not the message they’re pushing back against Marshall McLuhan’s claim in 'Understanding Media' and insisting that content, context, intention, and audience interpretation matter just as much — sometimes more — than the technology carrying the film. For me this idea pushes film theory away from technological determinism and back toward things like ideology, authorship, and spectator experience. It’s why debates about preservation, translation, and censorship are as important as debates about 35mm versus digital. Bazin’s love of the long take in 'What is Cinema?' sits beside Eisenstein’s montage; both are medium-sensitive, but when you say the medium is not the whole message you allow for social context, reception history, and industry conditions to reshape meaning. Practically, that perspective opens film studies to adaptation studies, fan practices, and platform effects: a scene streamed on a phone while someone scrolls Twitter functions differently than the same scene in a dark theater. I tend to think of films as ecosystems — medium helps form them, but it’s not the sole storyteller — and that complexity is why I keep going back to old movies with new eyes.

How should writers interpret the medium is not the message today?

4 Answers2025-08-27 21:48:26
There are mornings when I wake up scrolling through a feed and I feel like the old slogan 'the medium is the message' gets flipped on its head. Back when that phrase was coined, people were trying to point out how the delivery system shapes meaning — and that's still true — but today I think writers need to treat the medium as one ingredient, not the whole recipe. In practice that means I write imagining three things at once: the platform’s quirks (short form vs long-form, autoplay vs text), the audience’s context (commuting, skimming between classes, reading at midnight), and the piece’s core impulse (what feeling or insight I want to leave behind). I often type a paragraph on my phone during a bus ride and then expand it on a laptop later; the piece changes, but the core idea keeps surviving the format shifts. That survival is the real message. So for me, the takeaway is pragmatic: craft work that can wear different outfits. Focus on clarity, emotional hooks, and modularity so your words can move across places without losing soul. It’s a small habit that’s made my writing feel more resilient and, surprisingly, more honest.
Explore and read good novels for free
Free access to a vast number of good novels on GoodNovel app. Download the books you like and read anywhere & anytime.
Read books for free on the app
SCAN CODE TO READ ON APP
DMCA.com Protection Status